What would be true regarding the effect size for the following? t ratio 3.201, Sample size (n) -20, - A medium effect size is present. - A small effect size is present. - The effect size is neither small nor medium. -A strong effect size is present.

Ratuiszt 2022-09-06 Answered
What would be true regarding the effect size for the following?
t ratio 3.201
Sample size (n) -20
- A medium effect size is present.
- A small effect size is present.
- The effect size is neither small nor medium.
- A strong effect size is present.
You can still ask an expert for help

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question

Answers (1)

Domenigmh
Answered 2022-09-07 Author has 7 answers
when t ratio = 0.2, small effect size
t-ratio = 0.5, medium effect size
t- ratio = 0.8, large effect size
here, t-ratio = 3.201, which very large than 0.8 that why a strong effect size is present.
Answer is "A strong effect size is present."
Did you like this example?
Subscribe for all access

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

You might be interested in

asked 2022-09-04
Working on a problem related to effect size, I get this relation where
Q = log ( m ) ( m 1 m )
The domain of m is ] 0 , [. For a given Q, whenever I find a m = m satisfying the equality, the equality is also satisfied with m = 1 / m . Therefore, I can limit the domain of m to ] 1 , [.
Is there a formula that can isolate m so that given a value Q ( Q R + ), m follows?
asked 2022-11-04
Which of the following statements about effect size is true?
A larger difference between the population means leads to a smaller effect size.
Sample size (n) does not change the effect size.
A larger sample leads to a smaller effect size.
The difference between the populations means does not change the effect size.
asked 2022-11-10
Which of the following is true when thinking about statistical significance and effect sizes?
A. A statistically significant effect will always have a meaningful effect size.
B. A large effect size is will always be statistically significant.
C. A statistically non-significant effect can have a large effect size.
asked 2022-10-22
When looking at effect size, Cohen's dis 2.03. What does this indicate for effect size?
It does not pass the effect size test
The effect size is small
The effect size is medium
The effect size is large
asked 2022-08-09
For the independent-measures t statistic, what is the effect of increasing the sample variances?
A) decrease the probability of rejecting the H 0 and increase measures of effect size.
B) increase the probability of rejecting the H 0 and decrease measures of effect size.
C) decrease the probability of rejecting the H 0 and decrease measures of effect size.
D) increase the probability of rejecting the H 0 and increase measures of effect size.
asked 2022-08-07
Which of the following is true regarding effect size?
0.11 = moderate effect size
0.12 = small effect size
0.18 - small effect size
0.58= large effect size
asked 2022-08-22
We discussed five different measures of effect size for chi-square tests: Three of which belong to the d-family effect size; Two of which belong to the r- family effect size. List the name of all five measures of effect size.

New questions

i'm seeking out thoughts for a 15-hour mathematical enrichment course in a chinese language high faculty. What (pretty) simple concern would you advocate as a subject for any such course?
historical past/issues:
My students are generally pretty good at math, but many of them have no longer been uncovered to rigorous or summary mathematical reasoning. an amazing topic would be one that could not be impossibly hard for students who have by no means written or study proofs in English.
i have taught this magnificence three times earlier than. (a part of the purpose that i'm posting that is that i have used up all my thoughts!) the primary semester I taught an introductory range theory elegance (which meandered its way toward a proof of quadratic reciprocity, though I think this become in the end too advanced/abstract for some of the students). the second one semester I taught fundamental graph idea and packages (with a focal point on planarity and coloring). The 1/3 semester I taught a class at the Rubik's dice.
the students' math backgrounds are pretty numerous: a number of them take part in contest math competitions, and so are familiar with IMO-fashion techniques, however many aren't. a number of them may additionally realize some calculus, however I cannot assume it. all of them are superb at what in the united states is on occasion termed "pre-calculus": trigonometry, conic sections, systems of linear equations (though, shockingly, no matrices), and the like. They realize what a binomial coefficient is.
So, any ideas? preferably, i'd like to find some thing a bit "sexy" (like the Rubik's cube) -- tries to encourage wide variety theory through cryptography seemed to fall on deaf ears, however being capable of "see" institution idea on the cube became pretty popular.
(Responses specifically welcome from folks who grew up in the percent -- any mathematical subjects you desire were protected within the excessive college curriculum?)