How can we algebraically solve <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> | </mrow> x &#x2212;

Makayla Boyd

Makayla Boyd

Answered question

2022-06-16

How can we algebraically solve | x 1 | + | x 2 | > 1 ?

Answer & Explanation

Lisbonaid

Lisbonaid

Beginner2022-06-17Added 22 answers

Step 1
x 1 0 ; x 2 0 . Thus x 1 and x 2 .
This is the case that x 2
Okay: | x 1 | + | x 2 | > 1 so ( x 1 ) + ( x 2 ) > 1 so 2 x 3 > 1 so 2 x > 4 and x > 2 . And we restrict this to x 2 to get
x > 2 and x 2 so
Conclusion x > 2 .
Step 2
( x 1 ) 0 and ( x 2 ) < 0 . That is x 1 and x < 2 so this is the case that 1 x < 2 .
We get ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) > 1 so 1 > 1 . This is never the case so there are no solutions where 1 x < 2
If we want to be thurough we would say.
We must restrict to where 1 > 1 and 1 x < 2 . There are no cases where both are true.
Step 3
( x 1 ) < 0 and x 2 0 . This means x < 1 and x 2 . This is impossible. There are no such x and so no such x can be a solution (as there are no such x !).
If we want to be thorough (which we don't but let's pretend we do) we would solve
( x 1 ) + ( x 2 ) > 1 so 1 > 1 and or solution occurs when 1 > 1 and x < 1 and x 2 . As those three conditions are never concurrently true we have no solution in this interval which doesn't exist in the first place.
Step 4
( x 1 ) < 0 and ( x 2 ) < 0 . This means x < 1 and x < 2 so is the case when x < 1 .
So ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) > 1 so 2 x + 3 > 1 so 2 x > 2 so x < 2 .
So these solutions occur when x < 2 and x < 1
Conclusion: so these solutions occur whenever x < 1
Combining Case 1, and Case 4 (and 2 and 3 although those had no result) we have final solution
| x 1 | + | x 2 | > 1 if
x > 2 or x < 1 or x ( , 1 ) ( 2 , ) .
If we want to be thorough (which be now you should know we don't)
We could so we have solutions when:
x > 2 or 1 < 1 or ( x < 1 and x 2 ) or x < 1 or x ( 2 , ) ( , 1 ) =
( , 1 ) ( 2 , )
Step 5
Familiarity and common sense and we can allow ourselve to consider then intervals ( , 1 ] , [ 1 , 2 ] , and [ 2 , ) .
If x ( 1 ] then ( x 1 ) 0 ; x 2 < 0 so | x 1 | + | x 2 | = ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) = 2 x + 3 > 1 so x < 1
If x [ 1 , 2 ] then x 1 0 and x 2 0 so | x 1 | + | x 2 | = ( x 1 ) ( x 2 ) = 1 > 1 which is impossible.
If x [ 2 , ) then x 1 > 0 and x 2 0 so | x 1 | + | x 2 | = x 1 + x 2 = 2 x 3 > 1 so x > 2
So x < 1 or x > 2 and x ( , 1 ) ( 2 , )
this way we know x 1 < 0 while x 2 0 was absurd from the start and never needed to be considered in the first place.
dourtuntellorvl

dourtuntellorvl

Beginner2022-06-18Added 7 answers

Step 1
The best way to "try to avoid" errors is to consider the following intervals
x < 1 | x 1 | + | x 2 | > 1 1 x + 2 x > 1 2 x < 2 x < 1
1 x < 2 x 1 + 2 x > 1 1 > 1
x 2 | x 1 | + | x 2 | > 1 x 1 + x 2 > 1 x > 2

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?