Clarification about the Antiderivative of x^{-1/3}

Barrett Osborn

Barrett Osborn

Answered question

2022-11-03

Clarification about the Antiderivative of x 1 / 3 .
In some textbook the antiderivative of x 1 / 3 is written as
x 1 / 3 d x = 3 2 x 2 / 3 + C ,
where C is a constant. But should not the following function also be considered as an antiderivative of x 1 / 3 ?
F ( x ) = { 3 2 x 2 / 3 + C 0 ,  if  x >0 3 2 x 2 / 3 + C 1 ,  if  x <0
When C 0 C 1 , F(x) cannot be written as 3 2 x 2 / 3 + C.
Edit: I would like to clarify: which one of the following should be the correct answer to x 1 / 3 d x:
- 3 2 x 2 / 3 + C
- or { 3 2 x 2 / 3 + C 0 ,  if  x >0 3 2 x 2 / 3 + C 1 ,  if  x <0 ?

Answer & Explanation

yen1291kp6

yen1291kp6

Beginner2022-11-04Added 12 answers

Step 1
The integrand x 1 / 3 has a singularity at x = 0 and you cannot integrate across it. So the expressions in the negatives and in the positives are independent of each other and you can very well consider two constants. The derivative of the antiderivative and the original function do match wherever the function is defined.
Step 2
In practice it is often the case that you integrate in a single interval, so that the existence of another branch doesn't matter and writing C (which disappears in the definite integral) is enough.
This generalizes to functions with more singularities, say
2 d x x 2 1 = { x < 1 log | 1 x 1 + x | + C 0 , 1 < x < 1 log | 1 x 1 + x | + C 1 , x > 1 log | 1 x 1 + x | + C 2 .

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?