Frederick Kramer

Answered

2022-07-01

Suppose I were to be given 3 equations involving variables a, b, and c. The goal of the problem is to find the number of solutions (they do not necessarily have to be real) for the system of equations. Would it be more logical to use Cramer's Rule to solve the linear system or to use basic algebra? A roadmap of the following example problem or the like would be helpful.

A basic system taken from the book would be:

$\{\begin{array}{l}3a+4y-z=4\\ 3a+2b-11c=-13\\ a+2b+3c=7\end{array}$

A basic system taken from the book would be:

$\{\begin{array}{l}3a+4y-z=4\\ 3a+2b-11c=-13\\ a+2b+3c=7\end{array}$

Answer & Explanation

Darrell Valencia

Expert

2022-07-02Added 10 answers

There are several good ways to solve systems of linear equations, and the best method to use in any given situation is the one that requires the least amount of work. However, that will depend on the particular equations that you’re trying to solve.

Generally linear algebra offer more useful techniques especially if the matrix has some special structure.

In your case, for example, the Rouché-Capelli theorem says that there are infinite solutions with 1 degree of freedom.

Generally linear algebra offer more useful techniques especially if the matrix has some special structure.

In your case, for example, the Rouché-Capelli theorem says that there are infinite solutions with 1 degree of freedom.

fythynwyrk0

Expert

2022-07-03Added 7 answers

I would recommend linear algebra (read up on row reduction). Row-reduction is basically like basic algebra, just formalized and put into a notation that the computer can easily use. Good question though! Cramer's Rule is a way, but it uses determinants, which take longer and longer to compute as the matrix (system of equations) gets larger. Don't hesitate to ask questions about row-reduction if you have any!

Most Popular Questions