I have to prove, considering the limits of high and low temperatures, duality equation: Z=q e^(2NK) F(e^(-K))=q^(-N)(e^(K)+q-1)^(2 N)F((e^(K)-1)/(e^(K)+q-1))

reevelingw97

reevelingw97

Answered question

2022-11-07

I have to prove, considering the limits of high and low temperatures, duality equation:
Z = q e 2 N K F ( e K ) = q N ( e K + q 1 ) 2 N F ( e K 1 e K + q 1 )
for square lattice with
Z = σ 1 , σ N < i j > e K δ σ i σ j

Answer & Explanation

ustalovatfog

ustalovatfog

Beginner2022-11-08Added 11 answers

The duality equation can be proved using the Fortuin-Kasteleyn representation of the Potts model. Introduce link variables b i j { 0 , 1 } to rewrite the partition function as
Z = { σ } ( i , j ) e K δ σ i , σ j = { σ } ( i , j ) [ e K δ σ i , σ j + e 0 ( 1 δ σ i , σ j ) ] = { σ } ( i , j ) [ b i j = 0 1 ( ( e K 1 ) δ σ i , σ j δ b i j , 1 + δ b i j , 0 ]
The variables b i j form a graph on the lattice. The sum over the spins σ can now be performed leaving
Z = G u b ( G ) q C ( G )
where u = e K 1 is the number of edges in the graph G and C ( G ) is the number of clusters. The duality transformation consists in associating to each link b i j on the lattice a dual link b i j = 1 b i j on the dual lattice. Each loops on the dual lattice encloses a cluster on the lattice. Using Euler relations, one finally gets the duality relation.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?