# Which operation could we perform in order to find the number of milliseconds in a year? 60 * 60 * 24 * 7 * 365 1000 * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365 24 * 60 * 100 * 7 * 52 1000 * 60 * 24 * 7 * 52?

Question
Complex numbers
Which operation could we perform in order to find the number of milliseconds in a year?
$$\displaystyle{60}\cdot{60}\cdot{24}\cdot{7}\cdot{365}$$
$$\displaystyle{1000}\cdot{60}\cdot{60}\cdot{24}\cdot{365}$$
$$\displaystyle{24}\cdot{60}\cdot{100}\cdot{7}\cdot{52}$$
$$\displaystyle{1000}\cdot{60}\cdot{24}\cdot{7}\cdot{52}?$$

2020-12-26
We need to determine the number of milliseconds in a year.
First of all, "milli” means thousandth and thus one second contains 1000 milliseconds.
1s=1000 ms
Next, there are 60 seconds in one minute and thus the number of milliseconds in a minute is then obtain by multiplying the number of milliseconds in a second by the number of seconds in a minute, $$\displaystyle{1}\min={60}{s}={1000}\cdot{60}{m}{s}$$
Next, there are 60 minutes in one hour and thus the number of milliseconds in an hour is then obtain by multiplying the number of milliseconds in a minute by the number of minutes in a. hour.
$$\displaystyle{1}{h}={60}\min={1000}\cdot{60}\cdot{60}{m}{s}$$
Next, there are 24 hours in a day and thus the number of milliseconds in a day is then obtain by multiplying the number of milliseconds in an hour by the number of hours in a day.
1 day = $$\displaystyle{24}{h}={1000}\cdot{60}\cdot{60}\cdot{24}{m}{s}$$
Finally, we assume that there are 365 days in a year (assuming no leap years). The number of milliseconds in a. year is then obtain by multiplying the number of milliseconds in a. day by the number of days in a year.
1 year = 365 days = 1000-60. 60.24. 365 msZSK
We then note that the correct operation is $$\displaystyle{1000}\cdot{60}\cdot{60}\cdot{24}\cdot{365}.$$

### Relevant Questions

Find a subgroup of order $$\displaystyle{6}\in{U}{\left({700}\right)}$$.
Gastroenterology
We present data relating protein concentration to pancreatic function as measured by trypsin secretion among patients with cystic fibrosis.
If we do not want to assume normality for these distributions, then what statistical procedure can be used to compare the three groups?
Perform the test mentioned in Problem 12.42 and report a p-value. How do your results compare with a parametric analysis of the data?
Relationship between protein concentration $$(mg/mL)$$ of duodenal secretions to pancreatic function as measured by trypsin secretion:
$$\left[U/\left(k\ \frac{g}{h}r\right)\right]$$
Tapsin secreton [UGA]
$$\leq\ 50$$
$$\begin{array}{|c|c|}\hline \text{Subject number} & \text{Protetion concentration} \\ \hline 1 & 1.7 \\ \hline 2 & 2.0 \\ \hline 3 & 2.0 \\ \hline 4 & 2.2 \\ \hline 5 & 4.0 \\ \hline 6 & 4.0 \\ \hline 7 & 5.0 \\ \hline 8 & 6.7 \\ \hline 9 & 7.8 \\ \hline \end{array}$$
$$51\ -\ 1000$$
$$\begin{array}{|c|c|}\hline \text{Subject number} & \text{Protetion concentration} \\ \hline 1 & 1.4 \\ \hline 2 & 2.4 \\ \hline 3 & 2.4 \\ \hline 4 & 3.3 \\ \hline 5 & 4.4 \\ \hline 6 & 4.7 \\ \hline 7 & 6.7 \\ \hline 8 & 7.9 \\ \hline 9 & 9.5 \\ \hline 10 & 11.7 \\ \hline \end{array}$$
$$>\ 1000$$
$$\begin{array}{|c|c|}\hline \text{Subject number} & \text{Protetion concentration} \\ \hline 1 & 2.9 \\ \hline 2 & 3.8 \\ \hline 3 & 4.4 \\ \hline 4 & 4.7 \\ \hline 5 & 5.5 \\ \hline 6 & 5.6 \\ \hline 7 & 7.4 \\ \hline 8 & 9.4 \\ \hline 9 & 10.3 \\ \hline \end{array}$$
The table below shows the number of people for three different race groups who were shot by police that were either armed or unarmed. These values are very close to the exact numbers. They have been changed slightly for each student to get a unique problem.
Suspect was Armed:
Black - 543
White - 1176
Hispanic - 378
Total - 2097
Suspect was unarmed:
Black - 60
White - 67
Hispanic - 38
Total - 165
Total:
Black - 603
White - 1243
Hispanic - 416
Total - 2262
Give your answer as a decimal to at least three decimal places.
a) What percent are Black?
b) What percent are Unarmed?
c) In order for two variables to be Independent of each other, the P $$(A and B) = P(A) \cdot P(B) P(A and B) = P(A) \cdot P(B).$$
This just means that the percentage of times that both things happen equals the individual percentages multiplied together (Only if they are Independent of each other).
Therefore, if a person's race is independent of whether they were killed being unarmed then the percentage of black people that are killed while being unarmed should equal the percentage of blacks times the percentage of Unarmed. Let's check this. Multiply your answer to part a (percentage of blacks) by your answer to part b (percentage of unarmed).
Remember, the previous answer is only correct if the variables are Independent.
d) Now let's get the real percent that are Black and Unarmed by using the table?
If answer c is "significantly different" than answer d, then that means that there could be a different percentage of unarmed people being shot based on race. We will check this out later in the course.
Let's compare the percentage of unarmed shot for each race.
e) What percent are White and Unarmed?
f) What percent are Hispanic and Unarmed?
If you compare answers d, e and f it shows the highest percentage of unarmed people being shot is most likely white.
Why is that?
This is because there are more white people in the United States than any other race and therefore there are likely to be more white people in the table. Since there are more white people in the table, there most likely would be more white and unarmed people shot by police than any other race. This pulls the percentage of white and unarmed up. In addition, there most likely would be more white and armed shot by police. All the percentages for white people would be higher, because there are more white people. For example, the table contains very few Hispanic people, and the percentage of people in the table that were Hispanic and unarmed is the lowest percentage.
Think of it this way. If you went to a college that was 90% female and 10% male, then females would most likely have the highest percentage of A grades. They would also most likely have the highest percentage of B, C, D and F grades
The correct way to compare is "conditional probability". Conditional probability is getting the probability of something happening, given we are dealing with just the people in a particular group.
g) What percent of blacks shot and killed by police were unarmed?
h) What percent of whites shot and killed by police were unarmed?
i) What percent of Hispanics shot and killed by police were unarmed?
You can see by the answers to part g and h, that the percentage of blacks that were unarmed and killed by police is approximately twice that of whites that were unarmed and killed by police.
j) Why do you believe this is happening?
Do a search on the internet for reasons why blacks are more likely to be killed by police. Read a few articles on the topic. Write your response using the articles as references. Give the websites used in your response. Your answer should be several sentences long with at least one website listed. This part of this problem will be graded after the due date.
Two drugs, Abraxane and Taxol, are both cancer treatments, yet have differing rates at which they leave a patient’s system. Using terminology from pharmacology, Abraxane leaves the system by so-called “first-order elimination”, which means that the concentration decreases at a constant percentage rate for each unit of time that passes. Taxol leaves the system by “zero-order elimination”, which means that the concentration decreases by a constant amount for each unit of time that passes.
(a) As soon as the infusion of Taxol is completed, the drug concentration in a patient’s blood is 1000 nanograms per milliliter $$\displaystyle{\left(\frac{{{n}{g}}}{{{m}{l}}}\right)}.$$ 12 hours later there is $$\displaystyle{50}\frac{{{n}{g}}}{{{m}{l}}}$$ left in the patient’s system. Use the data to construct an appropriate formula modeling the blood concentration of Taxol as a function of time after the infusion is completed.
(b) As soon as the infusion of Abraxane is completed, the drug concentration in a patient’s blood is 1000 nanograms per milliliter $$\displaystyle{\left(\frac{{{n}{g}}}{{{m}{l}}}\right)}$$. 24 hours later there is $$\displaystyle{50}\frac{{{n}{g}}}{{{m}{l}}}$$ left in the patient’s system. Use the data to construct an appropriate formula modeling the blood concentration of Abraxane as a function of time after the infusion is completed.
(c) Find the long-term behavior of the function from part (b). Is this behavior meaningful in the context of the model?
Finance bonds/dividends/loans exercises, need help or formulas
Some of the exercises, calculating the Ri is clear, but then i got stuck:
A security pays a yearly dividend of 7€ during 5 years, and on the 5th year we could sell it at a price of 75€, market rate is 19%, risk free rate 2%, beta 1,8. What would be its price today? 2.1 And if its dividend growths 1,7% each year along these 5 years-what would be its price?
A security pays a constant dividend of 0,90€ during 5 years and thereafter will be sold at 10 €, market rate 18%, risk free rate 2,5%, beta 1,55, what would be its price today?
At what price have i purchased a security if i already made a 5€ profit, and this security pays dividends as follows: first year 1,50 €, second year 2,25€, third year 3,10€ and on the 3d year i will sell it for 18€. Market rate is 8%, risk free rate 0,90%, beta=2,3.
What is the original maturity (in months) for a ZCB, face value 2500€, required rate of return 16% EAR if we paid 700€ and we bought it 6 month after the issuance, and actually we made an instant profit of 58,97€
You'll need 10 Vespas for your Parcel Delivery Business. Each Vespa has a price of 2850€ fully equipped. Your bank is going to fund this operation with a 5 year loan, 12% nominal rate at the beginning, and after increasing 1% every year. You'll have 5 years to fully amortize this loan. You want tot make monthly installments. At what price should you sell it after 3 1/2 years to lose only 10% of the remaining debt.
Iron is very important for babies' growth. A common belief is that breastfeeding will help the baby to get more iron than formula feeding. To justify the belief, a study followed 2 groups of babies from born to 6 months. With one group babies are breast fed, and the other group are formula fed without iron supplements. Data below shows iron levels of those two groups of babies. $$\displaystyle{b}{e}{g}\in{\left\lbrace{a}{r}{r}{a}{y}\right\rbrace}{\left\lbrace{\left|{c}\right|}{c}{\mid}\right\rbrace}{h}{l}\in{e}{G}{r}{o}{u}{p}&{S}{a}\mp\le\ {s}{i}{z}{e}&{m}{e}{a}{n}&{S}{\tan{{d}}}{a}{r}{d}\ {d}{e}{v}{i}{a}{t}{i}{o}{n}\backslash{h}{l}\in{e}{B}{r}{e}\ast-{f}{e}{d}&{23}&{13.3}&{1.7}\backslash{h}{l}\in{e}{F}{\quad\text{or}\quad}\mu{l}{a}-{f}{e}{d}&{23}&{12.4}&{1.8}\backslash{h}{l}\in{e}{D}{I}{F}{F}={B}{r}{e}\ast-{F}{\quad\text{or}\quad}\mu{l}{a}&{23}&{0.9}&{1.4}\backslash{e}{n}{d}{\left\lbrace{a}{r}{r}{a}{y}\right\rbrace}$$ (1) There are two groups we need to compare for the study: Breast-Fed and Formula- Fed. Are those two groups dependent or independent? Based on your answer, what inference procedure should we apply for this research? (2) Please perform the inference you decided in (1), and make sure to follow the 5-step procedure for any hypothesis test. (3) Based on your conclusion in (2), what kind of error could you make? Explain the type of error using the context words for this research
What is $$\displaystyle{12}{\left({\cos{{60}}}+{i}{\sin{{60}}}\right)}$$