 # "I have a result that uses ordered fields. However, I am ignorant of the literature surrounding ordered fields. I have read the basic facts about them, such as those contained in the wikipedia page. However, in the introduction, I would like to provide some motivation. My result has the property that if it holds for some ordered field k, then it holds for any ordered subfield of k. Does that mean it is enough to prove my result for real-closed ordered fields? I also read the statement that to prove a 1st order logic statement for a real-closed ordered field, then it is enough to prove it for one real-closed ordered field, such as R for instance. Can someone please provide a reference for that? A mathematician mentioned to me a classical link between iterated quadratic extensions and ordere nikakede 2022-09-16 Answered
I have a result that uses ordered fields. However, I am ignorant of the literature surrounding ordered fields. I have read the basic facts about them, such as those contained in the wikipedia page. However, in the introduction, I would like to provide some motivation.
My result has the property that if it holds for some ordered field k, then it holds for any ordered subfield of k. Does that mean it is enough to prove my result for real-closed ordered fields?
I also read the statement that to prove a 1st order logic statement for a real-closed ordered field, then it is enough to prove it for one real-closed ordered field, such as R for instance. Can someone please provide a reference for that?
A mathematician mentioned to me a classical link between iterated quadratic extensions and ordered fields. What is the precise statement please?
I would also like a number of interesting examples of ordered fields. I know for example of an interesting non-archimedean example using rational functions (that I have learned about from the wikipedia page on ordered fields).
Does anyone know of a survey on ordered fields, or a reference containing answers to my questions above?
You can still ask an expert for help

• Live experts 24/7
• Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
• Personalized clear answers

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

• Math expert for every subject
• Pay only if we can solve it Aleah Harrell
A few remarks:
I don't know of a systematic study of ordered fields with many examples, but I can provide a few references as well as a list of types of ordered fields. For a general algebraic approach to ordered fields, you can look up the chapter "Ordered fields" in Serge Lang's Algebra. For notes about formally real fields or orderable fields, you can look at the work of Artin and Schreier. Most introductive books to model theory and its applications to algebra have a chapter about real closed fields.
Also, the book Super-real fields of Dale and Woodin studies set-theoretic properties of a class of real closed fields vaguely related to non-standard analysis, but this is not really something you need to look into unless you're interested in set theory.
As for gaining perspective on ordered fields, for good presentations of the role of different types of ordered fields in the conception of infinitesimals and continua, I suggest you look into the work of Philip Ehrlich, e.g. this one and here.
Examples of ordered fields
Here is a list of important types of ordered fields that are most frequently encountered.
-Archimedean ordered fields, in particular R, Q, and the field A of real algebraic numbers.
-Given a linear order E, and an ordered field F, the field F(E) of fractions of polynomials with indeterminates in E, see here in the case when F=Q. In particular, the field $F\left(X\right)\cong F\left(1\right)$ of rationnal functions with coefficients in F.
-Given a linearly ordered abelian group G, and an ordered field F, the field F[[G]] of Hahn series with value group G and residue field F.
-Given an ordered field F and a free ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$ on an infinite set I, the ultrapower ${}^{\ast }{F}_{\mathcal{U}}$ of F modulo $\mathcal{U}$, and especially the important case when F=R and I=N.
-Given a ε-number $\lambda$, the field No($\lambda$) of surreal numbers with birthdate strictly below $\lambda$, see here.
-Fields of real valued functions, in particular Hardy fields, see here for a perspective on those with respect to real asymptotic differential algebra.
-Fields of transseries, in particular logarithmic-exponential transseries, see here (careful: this article is about a different type of transseries than that mentionned in the Wikipedia article) or here (first preprint in the list).
Two functorial constructions
Important constructions within the class of ordered fields are the real closure and the Cauchy completion. Most of the examples above are already real-closed but few are Cauchy-complete, so this produces new examples of ordered fields.
The real closure construction ${F}_{real}$ and Cauchy completion construction ${F}_{Cauchy}$ are functors, in contrast with the algebraic closure for fields of a given characteristic). The corresponding categories are reflective within the category of ordered fields with certain types of morphisms. Moreover, we have ${F}_{Cauchy}\circ {F}_{real}\cong {F}_{real}\circ {F}_{Cauchy}\circ {F}_{real}$ (i.e. the Cauchy completion of a real-closed field remains real-closed). This makes it is easy to manipulate them in conjunction.
Universal formulas
In model theory, given a first order language, a universal formula is a formula $\varphi \left[\overline{x}\right]$ of the form $\mathrm{\forall }\overline{u}\left(\theta \left[\overline{x},\overline{u}\right]\right)$ where $\theta \left[\overline{x},\overline{u}\right]$ is quantifier-free.
Given a theory T, a formula $\phi \left[u\right]$ is said logically equivalent to a universal formula modulo T if there is a quantifer-free formula $\varphi \left[\overline{x}\right]$such that $T⊢\mathrm{\forall }\overline{x}\left(\phi \left[\overline{x}\right]↔\varphi \left[\overline{x}\right]\right)$. It is equivalent that $\phi \left[\overline{x}\right]$ be preserved by substructures, i.e. that for all models $\mathcal{M}\subseteq \mathcal{N}$ of T and $\overline{a}\in {M}^{n}$, that $\mathcal{M}\models \phi \left[\overline{a}\right]$ be equivalent to $\mathcal{N}\models \phi \left[\overline{a}\right]$.
In particular, if φ is a such a sentence in the language of ordered fields which one can prove for real closed fields, then since every ordered field embeds in a real-closed field (in particular, in its real closure), it is true in any ordered field.
By Tarski's work, the theory of real closed fields is elementary and complete, so it suffices to prove a first order result in R (or any other real closed field, but R is quite unique) to derive it in any ordered field. You will find Tarksi's result in any model theory book mentioning real closed fields.
Notice that if you take a sufficiently big cardinal κ and a free ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$ on κ, then ${}^{\ast }{\mathbb{R}}_{\mathcal{U}}$ contains any ordered field you want, so you can prove this only in this case. Likewise, No(κ) contains all ordered fields if κ is sufficiently big.
If a formally real field k is such that for $a\in {k}^{×}$, either a is a square or −a is a square (but not both), then it is uniquely ordered by saying that an element is positive if it is a square. In fact this is an equivalence, since given a in an ordered field F such that neither a nor −a are squares, the field $F\left[\sqrt{a}\right]$ admits two orders: one where $\sqrt{a}>0$ and one where $\sqrt{a}<0$. If one iterates quadratic extensions by square roots of elements a such that −a has no square root, then one obtains such a field with exactly one compatible (and easily defined) order. This may not be the classical result you were told about.

We have step-by-step solutions for your answer!