For which nonnegative integers n is 2n+3 =< 2^n? Prove your answer.

tragikovas

tragikovas

Answered question

2022-09-06

Proving Mathematical Induction
For which nonnegative integers n is 2 n + 3 2 n ? Prove your answer.
I know that we first have to inspect for the basis case and so we find that n > 3, since n = 1 , 2 , 3 do not hold but 4 plus does, so n > 3.. But for the Induction step I don't understand how to start it and the textbook solution is unclear, could anyone explain to me what this means?
Textbook solution: For the inductive step assume that P(k) is true. Then, by the inductive hypothesis, 2 ( k + 1 ) + 3 = ( 2 k + 3 ) + 2 < 2 k + 2.. But because k 1 , 2 k + 2 2 k + 2 k = 2 k + 1. This shows that P ( k + 1 ) is true.

Answer & Explanation

Aydin Rodgers

Aydin Rodgers

Beginner2022-09-07Added 12 answers

Step 1
2 1 < 2 2 < < 2 k
Step 2
Hence
2 k + 2 < 2 k + 2 k = 2 2 k = 2 k + 1
Krista Leon

Krista Leon

Beginner2022-09-08Added 12 answers

Step 1
Normally, when you have two functions f(n) and g(n), where for all n Z + , you have that 0 < f ( n ) , g ( n ) , and you establish a base case n 0 Z + such that n n 0 , you then have two separate strategies that you might follow to inductively prove that for all n Z + such that n n 0 , it is true that f ( n ) < g ( n ).
The first strategy would be to examine the general ratios:
R n = f ( n + 1 ) f ( n ) ,   S n = g ( n + 1 ) g ( n ) .
If you can show that for all n Z + ,, such that n n 0 , that 0 < R n < S n , then you can reason as follows:
Suppose that f ( n ) < g ( n ).
Then, you also have that f ( n + 1 ) = R n × f ( n ) and g ( n + 1 ) = S n × g ( n )
Therefore, since 0 < f ( n ) < g ( n ) and 0 < R n < S n ,, then R n × f ( n ) < S n × g ( n ) .
Step 2
The second strategy is very similar to the first strategy, except that instead of focusing on ratios, you focus on differences.
That is, let F n denote f ( n + 1 ) f ( n ) and let G n denote g ( n + 1 ) g ( n ).
Suppose that you can show that for all n Z + such that n n 0 , you have that F n < G n .
Then, you can reason as follows:
Assume that f ( n ) < g ( n )
Then, f ( n + 1 ) = F n + f ( n )
and g ( n + 1 ) = G n + g ( n )
Then, because f ( n ) < g ( n )
you have that F n + f ( n ) < G n + g ( n ) .
The second strategy above is what the offered solution focused on, differences.
To prove:
For all n Z + let f ( n ) = 2 n + 3 and let g ( n ) = 2 n ..
Then for all n Z + such that n 4
f ( n ) < g ( n )
First, the assertion was manually verified for n = 4.
Then, (in effect), the offered solution noted that F n = f ( n + 1 ) f ( n ) = [ 2 ( n + 1 ) + 3 ] [ 2 ( n ) + 3 ] = 2..
G n = g ( n + 1 ) g ( n ) = 2 n + 1 2 n = 2 n ..
Then, the offered solution noted that for n 4, you have that:
F n < G n
This conclusion allowed the second strategy above, that focuses on differences, to be invoked.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

New Questions in Discrete math

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?