# To state:The null and alternative hypotheses.

Question
Significance tests
To state:The null and alternative hypotheses.

2021-02-25
Justification:
Here, the claim is that the median tenure for workers from the representative's district is less than the national median tenure of 4.6 years. In the given experiment, the alternative hypothesis indicates the claim.
The test hypotheses are given below:
Null hypothesis:
$$H_{0} : Median > 4.6years$$
That is, the median tenure for workers from the representative's district is not less than the national median tenure of 4.6 years.
Alternative hypothesis (Claim):
$$H_{a}, : Median < 4.6 years$$
That is, the median tenure for workers from the representative's district is less than the national median tenure of 4.6 years.

### Relevant Questions

Hypothesis Testing Review
For each problem below, simply identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Use appropriate notation/symbols. You do not have to run any hypothesis tests, although it's good practice and I'll post answers for all of them.
1) A simple random sample of 44 men from a normally distributed population results in a standard deviation of 10.7 beats per minute. The normal range of pulse rates of adults is typically given as 60 to 100 beats per minute. If the range rule of thumb is applied to that normal range, the result is a standard deviation of 10 beats per minute. Use the sample results with a 0.10 significance level to test the claim that pulse rates of men have a standard deviation equal to 10 beats per minute.
2) In 1997, a survey of 880 households showed that 145 of them use e-mail. Use those sample results to test the claim that more than 15% of households use e-mail. Use a 0.05 significance level.
Hypothesis Testing Review
For each problem below, simply identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Use appropriate notation/symbols. You do not have to run any hypothesis tests, although it's good practice and I'll post answers for all of them.
1) A simple random sample of 44 men from a normally distributed population results in a standard deviation of 10.7 beats per minute. The normal range of pulse rates of adults is typically given as 60 to 100 beats per minute. If the range rule of thumb is applied to that normal range, the result is a standard deviation of 10 beats per minute. Use the sample results with a 0.10 significance level to test the claim that pulse rates of men have a standard deviation equal to 10 beats per minute.
2) In 1997, a survey of 880 households showed that 145 of them use e-mail. Use those sample results to test the claim that more than 15% of households use e-mail. Use a 0.05 significance level.
To state:The null and alternative hypothesis.
What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses.
In there a relationship between confidence intervals and two-tailed hypothesis tests? The answer is yes. Let c be the level of confidence used to construct a confidence interval from sample data. Let * be the level of significance for a two-tailed hypothesis test. The following statement applies to hypothesis tests of the mean: For a two-tailed hypothesis test with level of significance a and null hypothesis H_0 : mu = k we reject Ho whenever k falls outside the c = 1 — alpha confidence interval for mu based on the sample data. When A falls within the c = 1 — alpha confidence interval. we do reject H_0. For a one-tailed hypothesis test with level of significance Ho : mu = k and null hypothesiswe reject Ho whenever A falls outsidethe c = 1 — 2alpha confidence interval for p based on the sample data. When A falls within thec = 1 — 2alpha confidence interval, we do not reject H_0. A corresponding relationship between confidence intervals and two-tailed hypothesis tests is also valid for other parameters, such as p,mu1 — mu_2, and p_1, - p_2. (b) Consider the hypotheses H_0 : p_1 — p_2 = O and H_1 : p_1 — p_2 != Suppose a 98% confidence interval for p_1 — p_2 contains only positive numbers. Should you reject the null hypothesis when alpha = 0.05? Why or why not?
In there a relationship between confidence intervals and two-tailed hypothesis tests? The answer is yes. Let c be the level of confidence used to construct a confidence interval from sample data. Let * be the level of significance for a two-tailed hypothesis test. The following statement applies to hypothesis tests of the mean:
For a two-tailed hypothesis test with level of significance a and null hypothesis $$H_{0} : \mu = k$$ we reject Ho whenever k falls outside the $$c = 1 — \alpha$$ confidence interval for $$\mu$$ based on the sample data. When A falls within the $$c = 1 — \alpha$$ confidence interval. we do reject $$H_{0}$$.
For a one-tailed hypothesis test with level of significance Ho : $$\mu = k$$ and null hypothesiswe reject Ho whenever A falls outsidethe $$c = 1 — 2\alpha$$ confidence interval for p based on the sample data. When A falls within the $$c = 1 — 2\alpha$$ confidence interval, we do not reject $$H_{0}$$.
A corresponding relationship between confidence intervals and two-tailed hypothesis tests is also valid for other parameters, such as p, $$\mu1 — \mu_2,\ and\ p_{1}, - p_{2}$$.
(a) Consider the hypotheses $$H_{0} : \mu_{1} — \mu_{2} = O\ and\ H_{1} : \mu_{1} — \mu_{2} \neq$$ Suppose a 95% confidence interval for $$\mu_{1} — \mu_{2}$$ contains only positive numbers. Should you reject the null hypothesis when $$\alpha = 0.05$$? Why or why not?
For the same data, null hypothesis, and level of significance, if the conclusion is to reject $$H_{0}$$ based on a two-tailed test, do you also reject Ho based on a one-tailed test? Explain.