Do particles have to move in a straight line to apply Suvat equations?

on2t1inf8b 2022-07-19 Answered
Do particles have to move in a straight line to apply Suvat equations?
You can still ask an expert for help

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question

Answers (1)

bgr0v
Answered 2022-07-20 Author has 13 answers
Suvat equations come from the consideration that force in the system is constant. In Newtonian mechanics,
d v d t = a
Where, a, is a constant. This gives the result,
v = a t + c
To calculate the integration constant set t=0, and you shall have c = v 0 . The equation becomes,
v = a t + v 0
Similarly we know that,
v = d r d t = a t + v 0
Which gives us,
r = 1 2 a t 2 + v 0 t + c
To get the integration constant, set t=0 and the constant will be c = r 0 which will give us,
r = 1 2 a t 2 + v 0 t + r 0
You can get the third equation by taking dot product of v and doing some intelligent substitution to remove time variable. Any other variation can be achieved in similar ways. Also this makes your assumption kind of right, this equation holds for particle moving in a straight line, since by moving in straight line they are exhibiting constant acceleration. However, there can also be cases when acceleration is constant, and yet motion is not in a straight line. Obviously situations where the acceleration changes direction with the object, like a car turning around, will then move outside the domain of suvat equation since there is a centripetal force working on it which is not constant in direction. However when considered the force lies outside the object, for cases like projectile motion under constant gravity condition, the object's path will not be straight, however you can apply suvat equations. Although for any sort of constant circular acceleration, that is constant angular acceleration, like the discussed car's case, or spinning pebble attached with the string, one can come up with equations that corresponds to suvat's case in constant acceleration.
Not exactly what you’re looking for?
Ask My Question

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

You might be interested in

asked 2020-12-30

A majorette in a parade is performing some acrobatic twirlingsof her baton. Assume that the baton is a uniform rod of mass 0.120 kg and length 80.0 cm. 
With a skillful move, the majorette changes the rotation ofher baton so that now it is spinning about an axis passing throughits end at the same angular velocity 3.00 rad/s as before. What is the new angularmomentum of the rod?

asked 2021-12-15

An open tank has a vertical partition and on one side contains gasoline with a density p=700kgm3 at a depth of 4m. Arectangular gate that is 4 m high and 2 m wide and hinged at one end is located in the partition. Water is slowly added to the empty side of the tank. At what depth, h, will the gate start to open?

asked 2022-05-13
Once the commercial nuclear power plant is built for electricity production , after this what kind of research does scientists do in nuclear fusion power. Why I am asking this question is ITER is planning to build the fusion reactor in 2030s , So after what research does nuclear fusion scientists do?
asked 2022-04-12
In fusion terminology, what does it imply by taking orientational average of the fusion cross section when one of the nuclei has some static deformation/orientation? How is this average taken?
asked 2022-04-07
Accelerating particles to speeds infinitesimally close to the speed of light?
asked 2022-04-12
Why is travelling around the speed of light a problem? And why is it that the speed of light is the maximum?
asked 2022-05-10
In physics problems, the earth is usually considered to be an inertial frame. The earth has a gravitational field and the second postulate of the general theory of relativity says:
"In the vicinity of any point, a gravitational field is equivalent to an accelerated frame of reference in gravity-free space (the principle of equivalence)."
Does this mean that accelerating frames of reference can be inertial?

New questions

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question