On the atomic or molecular scale, why gravitational forces play no role because electric forces are enormously stronger?

Patricia Bean 2022-07-17 Answered
On the atomic or molecular scale, why gravitational forces play no role because electric forces are enormously stronger?
You can still ask an expert for help

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question

Answers (1)

sviudes7w
Answered 2022-07-18 Author has 12 answers
Gravity is the weakest force among all the fundamental forces. In atomic or molecular scale the gravitational attraction force is very weak. The atomic particles like protons, neutrons, electron have a mass in the order of 10 27   k g. The gravitational force is proportional to the mass of the particles.
Quantitatively let us calculate the gravitational force and the electric force between two protons.
Mass of proton, m = 1.67 × 10 27   k g
Charge of proton, q = 1.6 × 10 19   C
Distance between two protons is, r = 0.12   f m = 1.2 × 10 16   m approximately.
Gravitational force is given by,
F g = G m m r 2 (1)
Where, G is the gravitational constant having value of 6.674 × 10 11 m 3 k g s 2
Substituting the values in equation (1) we get,
F G = 6.674 × 10 11 × 1.67 × 10 27 × 1.67 × 10 27 ( 1.2 × 10 16 ) 2 N F G = 1.29 × 10 32 N (2)
Electric force is given by,
F e = k q q r 2 (3)
Where, k is the coulomb’s constant having a value of 9 × 10 9 N m 2 C 2
Substituting the values in equation (3) we get,
F E = 9 × 10 9 × 1.6 × 10 19 1.6 × 10 19 ( 1.2 × 10 16 ) 2 N F E = 1.6 × 10 4 N (4)
From the values of gravitational force and the electric force between two protons it is clear that the gravitational force is very weak in atomic scale and electric force is very strong.
Not exactly what you’re looking for?
Ask My Question

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

You might be interested in

asked 2021-02-05

The specific gravity of ice is 0.917, whereas that for seawater is 1.025. What fraction of an iceberg is above the surface of the water?

asked 2021-01-16

A block is on a frictionless table, on earth. The block accelerates at 5.3 ms2 when a 10 N horizontal force is applied to it. The block and table are set up on the moon. The acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the moon is 1.62 ms2. A horizontal force of 5N is applied to the block when it is on the moon. The acceleration imparted to the block is closest to: 
a) 2.9 ms2 
b) 3.2 ms2 
c) 3.4 ms2 
d) 2.7 ms2 
e) 2.4 ms2

asked 2021-02-06

A 0.450 kg ice puck, moving east with a speed of 3.00ms has a head in collision with a 0.900 kg puck, initially at rest. Assuming a perfectly elastic collision what will be the speed and direction of each object after the collision?

asked 2021-01-10

A 730-N man stands in the middle of a frozen pond of radius 5.0 m. He is unable to get to the other side because of a lack of friction between his shoes and the ice. To overcome this difficulty, he throws his 1.2 kg physics textbook horizontally toward the north shore , at a speed of 5.0 m/s. How long does ittake him to reach the south shore?

asked 2022-05-10

Two objects, with masses m1 and m2, attract each other with force F. If the mass of m1 increased by a factor of two then the new gravitational force would be: 
F/4
2 F
4 F
F/2

asked 2022-04-07
Why acceleration due to gravity is not reliably defined?
In Sean Carroll's Spacetime Geometry, there is the following line on Page No.50 in 2014th edition:
"The acceleration of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field is uniquely defined with respect to inertial frames.The EEP,on the other hand,implies that gravity is inescapable- there is no such thing as a "gravitationally neutral object" with respect to which we can measure the acceleration due to gravity. It follows that the acceleration due to gravity is not something that can be reliably defined,and therefore is of little use"
But, we do measure acceleration due to gravity of earth and moon. So why acceleration due to gravity is not reliably defined? Does this mean we cannot measure the true value of acceleration due to gravity of any massive object?
asked 2022-07-23
Why is the gravitational potential energy of ideal uniform massive spring m g x / 2, not m g x?
L = T V = 1 2 m 3 x ˙ 2 + 1 2 M x ˙ 2 1 2 k x 2 m g x 2 M g x
where m g x / 2 refers to gravitational potential energy of ideal spring. But I do not get why it's m g x / 2 instead of m g x. What is the reason?

New questions