Express Newton’s second law of motion for rotating bodies. What can you say about the angular velocity and angular momentum of a rotating nonrigid body of constant mass if the net torque acting on it is zero?
Express Newton’s second law of motion for rotating bodies. What can you say about the angular velocity and angular momentum of a rotating nonrigid body of constant mass if the net torque acting on it is zero?
Ethen Frey
2022-07-19
Answered
You can still ask an expert for help
Answers (1)
polishxcore5z
Answered 2022-07-20
Author has 14 answers
Newton’s second law of motion for rotating bodies states that the rate of change of angular momentum of body is equal to total torque acting on the body.
When net torque on the body is zero then the angular moment of the body remains constant. This is also known as the conservation of momentum.
The variation of angular velocity is shown as,
= constant
where
I = moment of inertia
= angular velocity
When net torque on the body is zero then the angular moment of the body remains constant. This is also known as the conservation of momentum.
The variation of angular velocity is shown as,
= constant
where
I = moment of inertia
= angular velocity
Not exactly what you’re looking for?
This is helpful
You might be interested in
asked 2020-10-18
The eye of a hurricane passes over Grand Bahama Island. It is moving in a dirction 60.0 degrees north of west with a speed of 41.0 km/h. Three hours later, the course of the hurricane suddenly shifts due north, and its speed slows to 25.0 km/h. How far from Grand Bahama is the hurricane 4.50 h after it passesover the island?
asked 2021-12-22
To throw a discus, the thrower holds it with a fully outstretched arm. Starting from rest, he begins to turn with a constant angular acceleration, releasing the discuss after making one complete revolution. The diameter of the circle in which the discus moves is about 1.8 m. If the thrower takes 1.0 s to complete one revolution, starting from rest, what will be the speed of the discus at release?
asked 2022-05-19
I have this expression for the gravitational force between 2 masses when the gr term is added:
which I got from the internet since I haven't bee able to find a similar expression in any book. But i'm not sure if it's right or needs fixing.
Is the second term in the force correct?
which I got from the internet since I haven't bee able to find a similar expression in any book. But i'm not sure if it's right or needs fixing.
Is the second term in the force correct?
asked 2022-05-08
The gravitational force between a planet and its moon is . For another moon orbiting the same planet with twice the orbital radius and 3 times the mass, what is the gravitational force?
asked 2022-07-17
Describe the gravitational forces.
asked 2022-04-07
Why acceleration due to gravity is not reliably defined?
In Sean Carroll's Spacetime Geometry, there is the following line on Page No.50 in 2014th edition:
"The acceleration of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field is uniquely defined with respect to inertial frames.The EEP,on the other hand,implies that gravity is inescapable- there is no such thing as a "gravitationally neutral object" with respect to which we can measure the acceleration due to gravity. It follows that the acceleration due to gravity is not something that can be reliably defined,and therefore is of little use"
But, we do measure acceleration due to gravity of earth and moon. So why acceleration due to gravity is not reliably defined? Does this mean we cannot measure the true value of acceleration due to gravity of any massive object?
In Sean Carroll's Spacetime Geometry, there is the following line on Page No.50 in 2014th edition:
"The acceleration of a charged particle in an electromagnetic field is uniquely defined with respect to inertial frames.The EEP,on the other hand,implies that gravity is inescapable- there is no such thing as a "gravitationally neutral object" with respect to which we can measure the acceleration due to gravity. It follows that the acceleration due to gravity is not something that can be reliably defined,and therefore is of little use"
But, we do measure acceleration due to gravity of earth and moon. So why acceleration due to gravity is not reliably defined? Does this mean we cannot measure the true value of acceleration due to gravity of any massive object?
asked 2022-07-16
A force F directed upwards is applied on an object resting on a flat surface. The object then moved to the right. Which of the following is TRUE about the upward force?a. F does work on the objectb. F is a conservative force c. F is gravitational forced. F caused the displacement of the objecte. Only the 1st and 3rd optionsf. Only the 2nd and 4th optionsg. None of the above
