If the velocity is a relative quantity, will it make inconsistent equations when applying it to the

Pattab 2022-07-14 Answered
If the velocity is a relative quantity, will it make inconsistent equations when applying it to the conservation of energy equations?
For example:
In the train moving at V relative to ground, there is an object moving at v relative to the frame in the same direction the frame moves. Observer on the ground calculates the object kinetic energy as 1 2 m ( v + V ) 2 . However, another observer on the frame calculates the energy as 1 2 m v 2 .
You can still ask an expert for help

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question

Answers (1)

Answered 2022-07-15 Author has 12 answers
Yes, kinetic energy is a relative quantity. As you might guess, this means that when you're using energy conservation, you have to stay within a single frame of reference; all that energy conservation tells you is that the amount of energy as measured in any one frame stays the same over time. You can't meaningfully compare the amount of energy measured in frame A (e.g. the ground) to the amount of energy measured in frame B (e.g. the train).
However, you can convert an amount of kinetic energy measured in one frame to another frame, if you know their relative velocity. If you're working at low speeds, the easy (approximate) way to do this is to just calculate the relative velocity, as you did. So if the train observer measures a kinetic energy K = 1 2 m v 2 , the ground observer will measure a kinetic energy of 1 2 m ( v + V ) 2 , or
K + 2 K m V + 1 2 m V 2
If you get up to higher speeds, or you want an exact expression, you'll have to use the relativistic definition of energy. In special relativity, the kinetic energy is given by the difference between the total energy and the "rest energy,"
K = E m c 2
One way to figure out the transformation rule is to use the fact that the total energy is part of a four-vector, along with the relativistic momentum,
( E / c p ) = ( γ v m c γ v m v )
where γ v = 1 / 1 v 2 / c 2 . This four-vector transforms under the Lorentz transformation as you shift from one reference frame to another,
( E / c p ) ground = ( γ γ β γ β γ ) ( E / c p ) train
(where β = V / c and γ = 1 / 1 β 2 ), so the energy as observed from the ground would be given by
E ground = γ ( E train + β c p train )
The kinetic energy is obtained by subtracting m c 2 from the total energy, so you'd get
K ground = γ ( E train + β c p train ) m c 2
which works out to
K ground = γ K train + ( γ 1 ) m c 2 + γ β c p train
where K is the relativistic kinetic energy and p is the relativistic momentum.
If you wanted it in terms of energy alone:
K ground = γ K train + ( γ 1 ) m c 2 + γ β K train 2 + 2 m c 2 K train
You might start to notice a similarity to the non-relativistic expression above ( K + 2 K m V + 1 2 m V 2 ), and indeed, if you plug in some approximations that are valid at low speeds ( γ 1, γ 1 V 2 / c 2 , K train 1 2 m v 2 m c 2 ), you will recover exactly that expression.
Did you like this example?
Subscribe for all access

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

You might be interested in

asked 2022-07-31

At one poinn a pipeline the water's spced is 3.00 ms and the gange pressure is

Sx l0 Pa. Find the gauge peessure al a seoond point in the line, 11.0 m bower thas

the first, if the pipe dianeter at the seccond point is twice that at the first.

asked 2022-09-23
Trying to derive the infinitesimal time dilation relation d t = γ d τ, where τ is the proper time, 𝑡 the coordinate time, and γ = ( 1 v ( t ) 2 / c 2 ) 1 / 2 the time dependent Lorentz factor. The derivation is trivial if one starts by considering the invariant interval d s 2 , but it should be possible to obtain the result considering only Lorentz transformations. So, in my approach I am using two different reference frames ( t , x ) will denote an intertial laboratory frame while ( t , x ) will be the set of all inertial frames momentarily coinciding with the observed particle, i.e. the rest frame of the particle. These frames are related by
t = γ ( t V x c ) , x = γ ( x V t ) ,
where V is some nonconstant (i.e. time dependent) parameter which is, hopefully, the velocity of the particle in the laboratory frame. Treating x, t and V as independent variables (for now) and taking the differential of the above relations,
d t = γ ( d t V d x c ) γ 3 c 2 ( x V t ) d V , and
d x = γ ( d x V d t ) γ 3 ( t V x c ) d V .
Imposing either the definition of the rest frame d x = 0 or (what should be equivalent) d x = V d t, the only way in which i obtain d t = γ d t is if d V = 0. So, the derivation breaks badly at some point or I must be wrong in using some of the above equations. Which one is it?
asked 2022-05-13
instead of assuming that the velocity c is a maximal velocity, proving that while assuming E = m c 2 .
asked 2022-07-21
Let A be a rocket moving with velocity v.
Then the slope of its worldline in a spacetime diagram is given by c / v.
Since it is a slope, c / v = tan ( θ ) for some θ > 45 and theta < 90.
Does this impose a mathematical limit on v?
If so what is it?
As in, we know tan ( 89.9999999999 ) = 572957795131.
And c = 299792458.
Using tan ( 89.9999999999 ) as our limit of precision, the smallest v we can use is:
c / v = tan ( 89.9999999999 )
299792458 / v = 572957795131
Therefore, v = 1911.18   m / s
What is the smallest non zero value of v?
asked 2022-10-16
Up to the work of Riemann and Gauss, this definition would have made clear to me examples of geometrical objects: a line, square, cube, hypercube; each of these possessing geometrical properties such as the number of sides, angles between faces, the dimension of space that contains them etc. Hence a geometrical object was a set of measurements associated with an object using a ruler.
After the work of Einstein and Minkowski who showed that time and space were a part of one another, would it be correct to say:
1. a geometrical object is a set of measurements associated with an object of distance and time using a ruler and a clock?
2. Geometrical objects includes an interval of time, the invariant space-time interval?
asked 2022-08-16
Let us assume that we placed lot's of ball touching each other in a hollow cylindrical tube, now if we push one ball at the end the ball at the other end move's instantly. So how do the information from one side of the tube travel's to the other side of the tube instantly. and at what speed at it travel's. If it travels at the speed of light so if make a long tube of the length of about 3 10 8 m it would take 1 second to see the effect at the other end assuming that nothing will bend or compress all thing's are ideal?
asked 2022-07-16
Three events A , B , C are seen by observer O to occur in the order A B C. Another observer O sees the events to occur in the order C B A. Is it possible that a third observer sees the events in the order A C B?
I could draw spacetime diagram for three arbitrary-ordered events for O and O . But I couldn't draw spacetime diagram for third observer.

New questions