This integral poses a challenge. Ordinarily integrating rational functions can be solved using the

desertiev5 2022-07-10 Answered
This integral poses a challenge.
Ordinarily integrating rational functions can be solved using the Hermite-Ostrogradski method. However, in the following integral, the coefficients β 0 , . . . , β 4 are not integers. (Hence, the Hermite-Ostrogradski method would not be appropriate).
Note: Expanding the integrand (trying to solve the integral using a partial fraction decomposition) is (because of the nature of the physical problem described by this integral) an inappropriate solution to this case.
1 β 0 + β 1 x + β 2 x 2 + β 3 x 3 + β 4 x 4 d x
How can this rational function be evaluated?
You can still ask an expert for help

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question

Answers (1)

Gustavo Brady
Answered 2022-07-11 Author has 9 answers
Note: Expanding the integrand (trying to solve the integral using a partial fraction decomposition) is (because of the nature of the physical problem described by this integral) an inappropriate solution to this case.
I'm sorry, but that is nonsense. Regardless of where this integration arises, what is inside of it is simply a mathematical function, and the result of the integration is also a mathematical function.
Other than that unknown constant of integration, this integral has only one solution. It does not matter what methods you used to arrive at that solution, the solution itself is the same function. If that solution is "inappropriate", you are out-of-luck. It is the solution. You can't change it.
Now some ways of expressing the solution are more useful than others, in that they allow you to calculate or approximate or manipulate it more easily or more accurately. But generally, you want to find the solution any way you can, then transform it into the most useful form.
So solve it by integration by parts, without assuming that each intermediary step must have some obvious physical meaning. Once you have a solution, figure out how to put it in the form you want.
Not exactly what you’re looking for?
Ask My Question

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

You might be interested in

asked 2021-02-25
True or False. The graph of a rational function may intersect a horizontal asymptote.
asked 2022-09-02
How do you write an inverse variation equations given y=8 when x=1.55?
asked 2022-02-16
I know that all meromorphic functions on CPP1 are rational functions. However, Im
asked 2022-08-31
If the discriminant is positive, but not a perfect square, the quadratic equation will have two different rational roots.
true of false
asked 2022-06-25
The form of the partial fraction decomposition of a rational function is given below.
x 3 x 2 26 ( x + 1 ) ( x 2 + 9 ) = A x + 1 + B x + C x 2 + 9
What are the values of A , B and C?
So can someone explain how to get the answer. I'm not sure how I got to the answer but I know B = 0 and C = 1
I also found the indefinite integral, which equals
1 3 tan 1 ( x 3 ) 3 log ( 1 + x ) + C
asked 2022-02-18
Guys need your help For the function, determine if it is a polynomial, rational function, both, or neither
f(x)=(6x54)2
a. Polynomial function only
b. Rational function only
c. Both polynomial and rational function
asked 2022-02-16
Construct all rational functions f (quotients of polynomials) in C such that (f)=6[0]4[5], where (f) is the divisor of the function f.
My answer/attempt: From my understanding of divisors, there seems to be exactly one function, namely, f(z)=z6(z5)4.
1.Are there any other functions with this divisor? If not, why?
2.If we restrict ourselves to divisors of rational functions only, then if we are given a divisor of a on C, does there exists a unique rational function f with (f)=?