Do cracks in solids spread at a characteristic speed? I have a feeling this is actually a pretty c

Palmosigx 2022-07-07 Answered
Do cracks in solids spread at a characteristic speed?
I have a feeling this is actually a pretty complicated problem in detail as I know a tremendous amount of research is done on the behavior of materials under stress, and I think the way materials fracture/crack is a useful diagnostic tool.
As a starting point, waves travel at the speed of sound in a material, which is to say they are mechanical waves. Do cracks also propagate at the speed of sound?
Another related question is, do the cracks in a solid move at a constant speed? Obviously it is possible for a crack to form and stop propagating, so this might imply a dissipation of some vibrational amplitude until the energy is below the point of being able to break bonds/fragment atoms (sheets for some solids). It also might imply that the crack does not behave like a wave and spreads at a non-constant speed. Which is right?
Lastly, do all solids follow the same rules for the speed at which they fracture? I'm thinking of glass, which probably is not a good place to start on this question because it is an amorphous solid (some people say incredibly viscous liquid but this feels like semantics). Obviously some glass will crack into large pieces and some will fracture like a spiderweb. Are these processes fundamentally the same but with different microscopic details? And how does fracturing in glass relate to something simpler like the breaking of a single atom solid? I haven't seen this happen, but surely it is possible.
Obviously there were quite a few question there, but they were only meant to give a general idea of the types of questions would be nice to have answered. Maybe the question is actually quite simple and one answer will suffice, or maybe it's complicated and there are multiple good answers.
You can still ask an expert for help

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question

Answers (1)

Answered 2022-07-08 Author has 21 answers
fracture mechanics is a complex field in which there are few if any characteristic equations that one can derive from first principles. Here are a few observations:
the simplest case is for perfectly brittle materials stressed in tension, in which crack propagation occurs at the velocity of sound in the material and is self-propagating when the stored strain energy field surrounding the crack tip contains enough energy to furnish the requisite energy of formation of the resulting free surfaces as the crack tip advances through the material.
things get frightfully complicated however when the material possesses ductility or visco-elasticity or is anisotropic or composed of a mixture of phases or microstructures or is at elevated temperature or very low temperature. you'd need to consult a materials science text dealing with fracture mechanics for guidance in any of these "interesting" cases.

We have step-by-step solutions for your answer!

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

You might be interested in

asked 2022-06-29
How do ripples form and why do they spread out?
When I throw a rock in the water, why does only a small circular ring around the rock rises instead of the whole water body, and why does it fall outwards and not inwards or why fall out in any direction instead of just going back down like ball which after getting thrown up falls back to its initial position?
asked 2022-06-27
Spread of the energy levels and sharp energy eigenvalues of the Schrodinger equation of the H-atom
Solving the Schroedinger equation for the H-atom (or any other system, say a particle in a box, or harmonic oscillator or anything), we obtain the energy eigenvalues are sharp with no spread. However, in reality, there must be a spread for the excited states which follows from uncertainty principle, and the spread of an energy level Δ E τ where τ is the lifetime of the particle in that state. Why is this effect not captured in the calculation of energy levels by solving the Schroedinger equation?
Is there any other way to compute the spread other than using the uncertainty principle and match them?
asked 2022-05-10
If an atom is put into motion will a constituent electron's wave spread over a LARGER region of space and will its energy be more dissipated?
My understanding is that a quantum event such as an electron moving between atomic levels takes place smoothly and continuously over a small discrete time interval during which time its energy will be relatively unstable.
Also an electron can spread out into a wave that extends over a region of space.
If an atom is put into motion will the electron's wave spread over a LARGER region of space than when stationary resulting in less energy per unit volume of space?
asked 2022-06-22
Does accelerating cosmological expansion increase beam spread?
In the standard textbook case, a transmitter of diameter D can produce an electromagnetic beam of wavelength λ that has spread angle θ = 1.22 λ / D. But what happens in an expanding cosmology, especially one that accelerates so that there is an event horizon? Does θ increase with distance?
Obviously each photon will travel along a null geodesic and after conformal time τ have travelled χ = c τ units of co-moving distance. The distance between the beam edges would in flat space be growing as δ = 2 c sin ( θ / 2 ) τ. Now, co-moving coordinates are nice and behave well with conformal time, so I would be mildly confident that this distance is true as measured in co-moving coordinates.
But that means that in proper distance the beam diameter is multiplied by the scale factor, a ( t ) δ (where t is the time corresponding to τ), and hence θ increases. However, the distance to the origin in these coordinates has also increased to a ( t ) ( c t ), so that seems to cancel the expansion - if we measure θ ( t ) globally by dividing the lengths.
But it seems that locally we should see the edges getting separated at an accelerating pace; after all, the local observers will see the emitter accelerating away from them, producing a wider and wider beam near their location since it was emitted further away. From this perspective as time goes by the beam ends up closer and closer to θ = π (and ever more red-shifted, which presumably keeps the total power across it constant).
Does this analysis work, or did I slip on one or more coordinate systems?
asked 2022-07-08
Can quantum particles spread out over large distances?
While trying to understand quantum mechanics I was wondering about this: since free quantum particles naturally spread out until the wave function collapses (if I understand correctly); does there exist an abundance of extremely spread out particles in outer space where interaction with other particles is rare or do the particles collapse before this happens?
To be more specific:
1.Does it occur often that particles in outer space reach macroscopic spreads of let's say multiple kilometers? Or does quantum decoherence occur before this happens? With spreading I mean σ x or the uncertainty in position.
2.If a particle reaches such a big spread, does this accelerate or inhibit wave function collapse?
A spread out particle covers more area making it interact with more matter but at the same the probability amplitude per area decreases making the chance of interaction smaller.
asked 2022-06-21
How can an electron be fired at a target when uncertainty principle says it will spread out around axis of motion?
Consider an electron fired at a target. Taking the axis of motion to be x, and position to be ( x , y , z ) then
Δ y = Δ z = 0
Therefore by the uncertainty principle
Δ p y = Δ p z =
So the electron will spread out in y and z and never hit its target (unless that target was very close i.e. on the same scale as the initial effective size of the electron). How can it hit a target in reality?
I realise there is a possible duplicate to this question: How can particles travel in a straight line? The accepted answer for the duplicate is "because is really small so the particles don't spread out much before hitting the target". I'm not sure this stands though. The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is:
i δ δ t ψ ( r , t ) = [ 2 2 μ 2 + V ( r , t ) ] ψ ( r , t )
In the absence of external potential V and dividing both sides by
i δ δ t ψ ( r , t ) = 2 μ 2 ψ ( r , t )
So if we change (or μ), sure the particle will spread out less as a function of time, but won't it also move slower in exactly the same proportion to its lack of spreading out, so it still won't hit the target?
asked 2022-06-02
The thickness of a non-spreadable liquid between two surfaces
There's this question I've come to when doing my research when working on polymer brushes; what I'm looking for is to find my reaction mixture thickness between two plates. So the setup is as follows: My bottom plate, with initiator on it. Then I put a drop of my reaction mixture on it which does not spread. Lastly, I put the top plate and the drop fills the gap between two plates and forms a film. I know how much the top plate weighs and the surface tension of drop and two plates, how can I calculate the film thickness between two plates? Here's my thought processes:
1.Should I look at the problem unsteady or steady? When thought of steady, I tried to equalize hydrodynamic pressure and weight of top plate but that did not match for the data of a paper working close to my work. They don't mention how they calculated their thickness.
2.Can I think of it simplistically? Like I know the volume of the drop that I put, I know the surface of the plate, then divide the volume by surface to get film thickness?

New questions