 # Fix some probability space ( <mi mathvariant="normal">&#x03A9;<!-- Ω --> , <mrow class= Caleb Proctor 2022-07-07 Answered
Fix some probability space $\left(\mathrm{\Omega },\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P}\right)$, and let $\mathcal{A}\subset \mathcal{F}$ be a sub-$\sigma$-algebra. Suppose that $g,h:\mathrm{\Omega }\to \mathbb{R}$ are two $\mathbb{P}$-integrable and $\mathcal{A}$-measurable functions.
I need help understanding why $\left\{h>g\right\}\in \mathcal{A}$? I understand that since $g$ and $h$ both are $\mathcal{A}$-measurable, it holds that for all $B\in \mathcal{B}\left(\mathbb{R}\right)$:
${h}^{-1}\left(B\right)\in \mathcal{A},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}{g}^{-1}\left(B\right)\in \mathcal{A}.$
However, I can't seem to make the connection as to why $\left\{h>g\right\}\in \mathcal{A}$ also holds true.
You can still ask an expert for help

• Live experts 24/7
• Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
• Personalized clear answers

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

• Math expert for every subject
• Pay only if we can solve it Keegan Barry
$\left\{h>g\right\}=\left\{h-g>0\right\}\in \mathcal{A}$ because if $h$ and $g$ are $\mathcal{A}$-measurable, then the difference $h-g$ is also $\mathcal{A}$-measurable.
To see this, note that for all $t\in \mathbb{R}$, $h-g for some rational $q$. So
$\left\{h-gq-t\right\}$
Hence $\left\{h-g as a countable union of elements of $\mathcal{A}$, and therefore $h-g$ is $\mathcal{A}$-measurable.

We have step-by-step solutions for your answer!