Lillianna Andersen

Lillianna Andersen

Answered

2022-07-03

Two apparently different antiderivatives of 1 2 x
What is right way to calculate this integral and why?
1 2 x d x
I thought, that this substitution is right:
t = 2 x
d t = 2 d x
d t 2 = d x
1 2 x d x = 1 t d t 2 = 1 2 ln | 2 x | + C .
But it's not right, because this is the correct answer:
1 2 x d x = 1 2 1 x d x = 1 2 ln | x | + C .
Can someone explain me, why is the first way wrong?

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Answer & Explanation

Tamia Padilla

Tamia Padilla

Expert

2022-07-04Added 16 answers

Step 1
The two answers actually agree, that is, the first calculation really does produce an antiderivative of 1 2 x as expected, at least provided we interpret C to be a general constant in both cases. Expanding the first antiderivative gives 1 2 ln | 2 x | + C = 1 2 ( log | x | + log 2 ) + C = 1 2 log | x | + ( C + 1 2 log 2 ) .
Step 2
So, if we denote C := C + 1 2 log 2, this antiderivative is 1 2 ln | x | + C ,, which (again, regarded as a family of functions, all equal up to an over constant) coincides with the second antiderivative.
This exemplifies the statement that an antiderivative of a given function is unique up to addition of an overall constant. (Actually, this only need be true when the domain of the function is connected, which in particular is not the case for the given integrand, but this isn't essential to the question at hand.)

Still Have Questions?

Ask Your Question
Sylvia Byrd

Sylvia Byrd

Expert

2022-07-05Added 6 answers

Explanation:
You are correct.
Since ln | 2 x | = ln | x | + ln 2
1 2 x   d x = ln | 2 x | + C 1 = ln | x | + ln 2 + C 1 New Const = ln | x | + C

Free Math Solver

Help you to address certain mathematical problems

Try Free Math SolverMath Solver Robot

Ask your question.
Get your answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?