What are some examples when practical significance would outweigh statistical significance?

Damon Stokes
2022-06-26
Answered

What are some examples when practical significance would outweigh statistical significance?

You can still ask an expert for help

Xzavier Shelton

Answered 2022-06-27
Author has **26** answers

It depends on your risk tolerance, which is different for everyone. It also requires that you understand that "significance" itself is relative to the test parameters and sample sizes.

In ALL cases, statistics are only a tool to assist people in making better decisions. They are neither absolute nor infallible. They also include their own set of assumptions that may not be accurate.

Generally, the "judgement call" that goes against an evaluation of "statistical significance" is based on a personal or financial risk tolerance.

A forecast for sunny skies may be statistically significant for a particular set of criteria, but IF it rains, the outcome could be perceived as more disastrous for an individual.

Similarly, a calculated significance of one product line performance over another may be too marginal to overcome the owner's personal preference or fear of financial loss.

Finally, a "significant difference" in poll readings may again be subject to future changes or personal perceptions of future outcomes. In that case, any decision based on the poll results would be either deferred for more data, or rejected entirely for other "practical" reasons of the individuals.

In ALL cases, statistics are only a tool to assist people in making better decisions. They are neither absolute nor infallible. They also include their own set of assumptions that may not be accurate.

Generally, the "judgement call" that goes against an evaluation of "statistical significance" is based on a personal or financial risk tolerance.

A forecast for sunny skies may be statistically significant for a particular set of criteria, but IF it rains, the outcome could be perceived as more disastrous for an individual.

Similarly, a calculated significance of one product line performance over another may be too marginal to overcome the owner's personal preference or fear of financial loss.

Finally, a "significant difference" in poll readings may again be subject to future changes or personal perceptions of future outcomes. In that case, any decision based on the poll results would be either deferred for more data, or rejected entirely for other "practical" reasons of the individuals.

asked 2022-08-09

The benefit of diversification when constructing a portfolio is that it can eliminate

a. speculative bubbles.

b. risk aversion.

c. firm-specific risk.

d. market risk.

a. speculative bubbles.

b. risk aversion.

c. firm-specific risk.

d. market risk.

asked 2022-08-20

For a relative risk of 2.1, what is the percent increase in risk? For a percent increase in risk of 40%, what is the relative risk?

asked 2022-06-14

What does alpha and beta signify in portfolio analysis?

asked 2022-08-10

In theory, market risk should be the only "relevant" risk. However, companies focus as much on standalone risk as on market risk. What are the reasons for the focus on standalone risk?

asked 2022-07-21

For each of the following measures, give the value that implies no difference between the two groups being compared. Relative risk. Odds ratio. Percent increase in risk.

asked 2022-08-12

Distinguish among beta (or market) risk, within-firm (or corporate) risk, and stand-alone risk for a project being considered for inclusion in the capital budget

asked 2022-11-20

Use the information at the beginning of the lesson. The Palermo scale value of any object can be found using the equation

$PS={\mathrm{log}}_{10}R$

where R is the relative risk posed by the object. Write an equation in exponential form for the inverse of the function.

$PS={\mathrm{log}}_{10}R$

where R is the relative risk posed by the object. Write an equation in exponential form for the inverse of the function.