Antiderivative of a function Prove or disprove that f ( x ) = { <mta

sedeln5w

sedeln5w

Answered question

2022-06-20

Antiderivative of a function
Prove or disprove that
f ( x ) = { sin ( 1 x ) for  x 0 1 2 for  x = 0
has an antiderivative in R .
This function satisfies the Darboux's property, but how to say definitely that admits an antiderivative?

Answer & Explanation

Nia Molina

Nia Molina

Beginner2022-06-21Added 21 answers

Step 1
It doesn't have an antiderivative. Let g ( x ) = { sin ( 1 x )  if  x 0 0  if  x = 0 .
Then g has an antiderivative. So, if f had one, f g would have an antiderivative too. But f−g doesn't satisfy the Darboux property.
In order to see why g has an antiderivative, consider the function
h ( x ) = { x 2 cos ( 1 x )  if  x 0 0  if  x = 0.
Step 2
Then h ( x ) = { 2 x cos ( 1 x ) + sin ( 1 x )  if  x 0 0  if  x = 0.
But the function x { 2 x cos ( 1 x )  if  x 0 0  if  x = 0
is continuous and therefore has an antiderivative. Therefore, g has an antiderivative too.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?