Let u , v : [ 0 , <mi mathvariant="normal">&#x221E;<!-- ∞ --> ) &#x2192;<!-- →

Feinsn

Feinsn

Answered question

2022-06-20

Let u , v : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) satsfying the following system of differential inequalities:
u ( t ) a 1 u ( t ) + a 2 v ( t ) + a 0 v ( t ) b 1 u ( t ) + b 2 v ( t ) + b 0
for suitable coefficients a 0 , a 1 , a 2 , b 0 , b 1 , b 2 R . In particular I have a 1 , b 2 < 0 and 0 < b 1 < | b 2 |
Is there a Gronwall lemma for this system of linear differential inqualities? Namely an (optimal) inequality of type
u ( t ) F ( t ) v ( t ) G ( t )
where the functions F , G : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) depend on u , v only through their initial values u ( 0 ) , v ( 0 )?

Answer & Explanation

Colin Moran

Colin Moran

Beginner2022-06-21Added 21 answers

If x R n , A M n × n , and a is a vector function of one variable with
X ( t ) a ( t ) + t 0 t A X ( s ) d s
then it is true that
X ( t ) a ( t ) + t 0 t V ( t , s ) A a ( s ) d s
where the kernel is an n × n matrix that satisfies the relation
V ( t , s ) = I + s t A V ( y , s ) d y
Here the inequalities are taken component-wise. Basically what this theorem really says is that, indeed, a system of linear inequalities is upper bounded by the solution of the corresponding linear system of equalities. One can verify doing some trivial matrix algebra that whenever A is constant, the kernel has the form
V ( t , s ) = e A ( t s )
Finally, we turn to our specific problem. To transform it into the form required by the theorem, set
X ( t ) = ( u ( t ) v ( t ) )   ,   A = ( a 1 a 2 b 1 b 2 )   ,   c = ( a 0 b 0 )
and integrate all inequalities once to obtain
X ( t ) X 0 + c t + 0 t A X ( s ) d s
for which the extended Gronwall's lemma implies that
X ( t ) X 0 + c t + 0 t e A ( t s ) A ( X 0 + c s ) d s
which, noting that A as defined above is invertible, with the help of the following integrals
0 t e A s d s = A 1 ( I e A t )
0 t s e A s d s = A 2 ( I ( I + A t ) e A t )
can be written in the simple form
X ( t ) X 0 e A t + A 1 ( e A t 1 ) c
Calculating matrix exponentials for general coefficients requires diagonalization of the matrix A, which is tractable since the matrix is only 2 × 2

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?