Antiderivatives of 1 x &#x2212;<!-- − --> 1 </mrow> </mfrac>

skylsn

skylsn

Answered question

2022-06-14

Antiderivatives of 1 x 1
I was told to find the anti-derivative of this problem:
2 x 2 13 x + 18 x 1 d x
I solved the problem - first dividing and then finding the anti-derivative:
x 2 11 x + 7 ( ln ( x 1 ) ) + c
The given answer was the same as mine, but they put the x 1 in ln ( x 1 ) in absolute value ln | x 1 | . Why?

Answer & Explanation

odmeravan5c

odmeravan5c

Beginner2022-06-15Added 20 answers

Expanation:
Consider what happens if x < 1: The original function makes complete sense, so there ought to be an antiderivative, but your expression doesn't make sense. Calculate it, and ln ( 1 x ) appears. The two antiderivatives for x < 1 and x > 1 are most easily stitched together with an absolute value.
Finley Mckinney

Finley Mckinney

Beginner2022-06-16Added 11 answers

Step 1
A lot of people are telling you it's a domain error, but I will try to give an explanation for a beginner level calculus student looking at this problem. This isn't exactly your problem, but explains why we include the absolute value around ln|x|.
Look at this integral 2 1 1 x d x
Now if you graph this function it is very clear that this function is defined on this interval, so you should be able to take the area under the curve right?
Step 2
Since you know that the antiderivative of 1 x is ln(x), the result should be ln ( x ) | 2 1 = ln ( 1 ) ln ( 2 )
ln(x) is not defined for x 0 (well unless we're in complex plane, but thats a whole other can of worms)! So in order to make sure this integral is correctly evaluated for x < 0, we need to place absolute value signs around the argument 2 1 1 x d x = ln | 1 | ln | 2 | = ln 2

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?