I have a question about the notation used in this problem please dont solve the problem for me.
Show that for independent r.vs and . Show further that if and are also integrable, then
I don't understand what the difference between and . I assume we're talking about the norm? But then
So if this is finite, then exists therefore it is integrable already (so why "also"?) Therefore the first "show that" would follow from the second
Show that for independent r.vs and . Show further that if and are also integrable, then
I don't understand what the difference between and . I assume we're talking about the norm? But then
So if this is finite, then exists therefore it is integrable already (so why "also"?) Therefore the first "show that" would follow from the second