Let &#x03BD;<!-- ν --> be a signed measure on ( X , <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"

velitshh

velitshh

Answered question

2022-05-26

Let ν be a signed measure on ( X , M ). We call the set E positive if ν ( F ) 0 for any F E. For a sequence { E j } j = 1 of positive sets, it's easy to check that 1 E j is also a positive set. Intuitively, the sum of positive measure is still positive. However, given a sequence { G i } i I of positive sets for uncountable index set I, do we have i I G i being a positive set?
Technically, I think it's not a positive set since the uncountable union of measurable set might not be in M anymore. Is my reasoning correct? However, I feel that the intuition "sum of positive measures should be positive" still holds here.

Answer & Explanation

Kumamotors

Kumamotors

Beginner2022-05-27Added 8 answers

Consider the signed measure ν ( E ) = E f d μ where μ is Lebesgue measure. Note that E is a positive set if f 0 almost everywhere. However, the uncountable union accumulates null sets into a set with a non-zero measure. That is, let f = 1 and E = ( 0 , 1 ]. Let { x i } x i E be a sequence of positive sets. However, ν ( i x i ) = ν ( E ) = 1 which is not a positive set.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?