I was following along a Y-T video proving that there is no useful measure on the power set of <m

Bailee Landry

Bailee Landry

Answered question

2022-05-23

I was following along a Y-T video proving that there is no useful measure on the power set of R . The proof is too long to lay out here but I'm certain that most respondents here will recognize it if I just describe it.
The proof starts by pulling all the rational numbers from (0,1], creating little `boxes' along the interval. Next construct a set A that contains one and only one point from each box. Then create a sequence, A n by adding a rational r from (-1,1), jogging A left and right in (-1,2]. Then we take the countable union of the A n , and here's where I lose the plot. The claim, setting up the final blow in the proof, is that
(0,1] { A n , n N } ( 1 , 2 ]
I get the RHS but the LHS looks exactly wrong to me. (0,1] contains all the reals and by construction the term in the middle is devoid of the rational numbers. How can the term in the middle contain (0,1]?

Answer & Explanation

Haleigh Vega

Haleigh Vega

Beginner2022-05-24Added 13 answers

My claim about the middle term is wrong. While it's true that the set A is constructed to exclude the rational numbers in (0,1], the A n are constructed by adding the rational numbers in (-1,1] to A, thus restoring those removed.
This closes the question unless someone has something else to add.

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?