Statement: "Whole System Thinking, resilience, and business continuity.

Statement: "Whole System Thinking, resilience, and business continuity. The last thing that any sentient energy-dependent organisation wants is to suffer a supply catastrophe with no or an insufficiently viable Plan B. Using Whole System Thinking can cover just that by implementing back-up solutions for energy infrastructure to ensure that in the event of mains power failure, your systems see a near seamless transfer and maintain continuity of supply. In the complex and sensitive environment of a data centre, failure is not an option. The infrastructure that manages power, cooling, and waste emissions must be resilient, secure, efficient, and affordable, to maintain round the clock connectivity. 

Whole System Thinking ensures that you can get exactly what you need for your specific and unique data centre, and not a “one size fits all” solution. What exactly does a Whole System Thinking approach mean for you? Whole System Thinking is not only a philosophy but also as a practical and successful way of working for all stakeholders involved. 

Picking up piecemeal can result in the unfortunate outcome of finding problems at a later stage that could have been anticipated and resolved at the outset of the overall construction project and it’s ancillary but essential infrastructure. 

While short-term and diffuse planning can make it easy to find short-term cost benefits, it runs the risk of long-term fragmentation and running with systems that are unfit for the future. 

Choose your ground  wisely."

What is wrong with this statement? Why is it nonsense?