Does GR imply a fundamental difference between gravitational and non-gravitational acceleration?
1.Does the equivalence principle imply that there is some fundamental difference between acceleration due to gravity and acceleration by other means (because there is no way to 'feel' free fall acceleration for a uniform gravitational field)?
2.Does General Relativity allow you to describe the acceleration due to gravity without Newton's second law (because every other source of 'push or pull' outside the nucleus involves the electromagnetic field)?
3.Is the acceleration due to gravity a result of changes in time dilation/length contraction as opposed to an actual push or pull?\
1.Does the equivalence principle imply that there is some fundamental difference between acceleration due to gravity and acceleration by other means (because there is no way to 'feel' free fall acceleration for a uniform gravitational field)?
2.Does General Relativity allow you to describe the acceleration due to gravity without Newton's second law (because every other source of 'push or pull' outside the nucleus involves the electromagnetic field)?
3.Is the acceleration due to gravity a result of changes in time dilation/length contraction as opposed to an actual push or pull?\