I know that the n-dimensional Lebesgue-Measure &#x03BB;<!-- λ --> n </msup> is d

kromo8hdcd

kromo8hdcd

Answered question

2022-05-13

I know that the n-dimensional Lebesgue-Measure λ n is defined at least on all Borel Sets B n = B ( R n ). Let's assume A = ( a , b ) R n .
(i) My first question is whether it is possible to define λ n ( A )? I suppose that this leads to λ n ( A ) = 0?
(ii) Is it allowed to use the 1-dimensional Lebesgue-Measure here or can we do no other than using λ n since the space is R n ?
May anybody have an answer/explanation to this?

Answer & Explanation

odvucimo1pp17

odvucimo1pp17

Beginner2022-05-14Added 23 answers

Firstly, ( a , b ) is not a subset of R n for n 2. Perhaps you want to embed ( a , b ) R in R n through a homeomorphism. In particular, you can consider the set A = ( a , b ) × { 0 } × × { 0 } n 1  times R n . A and A are homeomorphic via the obvious map f : A A , t ( t , 0 , , 0 ).
1. Instead of λ n ( A ), it makes sense to find λ n ( A ). Indeed, λ n ( A ) = 0.
2. No, you cannot use the one-dimensional Lebesgue measure here, since your set is a subset of R n (and not R ).

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?