Question

Is the gift you purchased for that special someone really appreciated? This was the question investigated in the Journal of Experimental Social Psycho

Study design
ANSWERED
asked 2020-12-30
Is the gift you purchased for that special someone really appreciated? This was the question investigated in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 45, 2009). Toe researchers examined the link between engagement ring price (dollars) and level of appreciation of the recipient \(\displaystyle{\left(\text{measured on a 7-point scale where}\ {1}=\ \text{"not at all" and}\ {7}=\ \text{to a great extent"}\right)}.\) Participants for the study were those who used a popular Web site for engaged couples. The Web site's directory was searched for those with "average" American names (e.g., "John Smith," "Sara Jones"). These individuals were then invited to participate in an online survey in exchange for a $10 gift certificate. Of the respondents, those who paid really high or really low prices for the ring were excluded, leaving a sample size of 33 respondents. a) Identify the experimental units for this study. b) What are the variables of interest? Are they quantitative or qualitative in nature? c) Describe the population of interest. d) Do you believe the sample of 33 respondents is representative of the population? Explain. e. In a second, designed study, the researchers investigated whether the link between gift price and level of appreciation was stronger for birthday gift givers than for birthday gift receivers. Toe participants were randomly assigned to play the role of gift-giver or gift-receiver. Assume that the sample consists of 50 individuals. Use a random number generator to randomly assign 25 individuals to play the gift-receiver role and 25 to play the gift-giver role.

Answers (1)

2020-12-31

a) The experimental units are people who use that popular Web site for engaged couples, since those are the individuals from which we want some information (engagement ring price and level of appreciation). b) The variables measured were Engagement ring price and Level of appreciation The first variable (engagement ring price) is a quantitative variable, sinceit is a numerical measurement (in dollars). The second variable (level of appreciation) is qualitative, since it takes on values which are category names (integers ranging from 1 to7). Don't be tempted to think that this is a quantitative variable simply because it's values are numbers - the numbers are merely symbols (or codes) for categories ranging from "not at all appreciated" to "appreciated to a great extent". c) The population of interest consist of all people who use that popular Web site for engaged couples, since that's the collection of all individuals from which some information (engagement ring price and level of appreciation) is wanted. d) Yes, this sample is most likely representative. The sample included 33 people who usually visit that Web site. The participants were recruited based on their names (the researchers for those with "average" names). There is no reason that people with "average" names would differ, in any way, from the entire population, since name is not a characteristic that would determine someone's behaviour or tendencies. e) If available, you can use statistical sofware R to generate this random assignment (that's what we used, and we present the code below). Other optionsinclude Exel, Minitab or some websites. First we label each of the 50 participants in our random sample with numbers (integers) from 1 to 50. Then it,s sufficient to randomly choose 25 values from our set of 50 numbers (i.e. from our sample of 50 participants) and assingthem to play the role of gift-receiver (for instance). The remaining 25 people would then play the role of gift-giver. The following short piece of code written in statistical software R will perform the above procedure: \(\text{partipants}\leftarrow1:50\quad \#\# \text{random sample of 50 partipants}\\ \#\# \text{chose 25 random values from the above set of 50 values:}\\ \text{gift_givers}\leftarrow\text{sample (participants, 25, replace=F, prob=NULL)}\\ \text{gift_receivers}\leftarrow\text{setdiff(participants, gift_givers)}\)

For instance, we obtained the following result (assignment):

\(\begin{array}{c|c} \text{gift_giver} & \text{gift_receiver} \\ \hline 2 & 1 \\ 3 & 4 \\ 7 & 5 \\ 8 & 6 \\ 10 & 9 \\ 12 & 11 \\ 17 & 13 \\ 18 & 14 \\ 22 & 15 \\ 23 & 16 \\ 26 & 19 \\ 27 & 20 \\ 30 & 21 \\ 32 & 24 \\ 34 & 25 \\ 35 & 28 \\ 36 & 29 \\ 37 & 31 \\ 38 & 33 \\ 39 & 40 \\ 41 & 42 \\ 44 & 43 \\ 46 & 45 \\ 47 & 49 \\ 48 & 50\\ \end{array}\)

0
 
Best answer

expert advice

Need a better answer?

Relevant Questions

asked 2021-05-14
When σ is unknown and the sample size is \(\displaystyle{n}\geq{30}\), there are tow methods for computing confidence intervals for μμ. Method 1: Use the Student's t distribution with d.f. = n - 1. This is the method used in the text. It is widely employed in statistical studies. Also, most statistical software packages use this method. Method 2: When \(\displaystyle{n}\geq{30}\), use the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σσ, and then use the standard normal distribution. This method is based on the fact that for large samples, s is a fairly good approximation for σσ. Also, for large n, the critical values for the Student's t distribution approach those of the standard normal distribution. Consider a random sample of size n = 31, with sample mean x¯=45.2 and sample standard deviation s = 5.3. (c) Compare intervals for the two methods. Would you say that confidence intervals using a Student's t distribution are more conservative in the sense that they tend to be longer than intervals based on the standard normal distribution?
asked 2021-06-19
When two targets are presented close together in a rapid visual stream, the second target is often missed. Psychologists call this phenomenon the attentional blink (AB). A study published in Advances in Cognitive Psychology (July 2013) investigated whether simultaneous or preceding sounds could reduce AB. Twenty subjects were presented a rapid visual stream of symbols and letters on a computer screen and asked to identify the first and second letters (the targets). After several trials, the subject's AB magnitude was measured as the difference between the percentages of first target and second target letters correctly identified. Each subject performed the task under each of three conditions. In the Simultaneous condition, a sound (tone) was presented simultaneously with the second target; in the Alert condition, a sound was presented prior to the coming of the second target; and in the No-Tone condition, no sound was presented with the second target. Scatterplots of AB magnitude for each possible pair of conditions are shown below as well as the least squares line for each. a. Which pair of conditions produces the least squares line with the steepest estimated slope? b. Which pair of conditions produces the least squares line with the largest SSE? c. Which pair of conditions produces the least squares line with the smallest estímate of σ?
asked 2021-06-16
Refer to the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 45, 2009) study of whether buying gifts truly buys love. Recall that study participants were randomly assigned to play the role of gift giver or gift receiver. Gift receivers were asked to provide the level of appreciation (measured on a 7-point scale where 1 = "not at all" and 7 = "to a great extent") they had for the last birthday gift they received from a loved one. Gift givers were asked to recall the last birthday gift they gave to a loved one and to provide the level of appreciation the loved one had for the gift. The researchers wanted to know if the average level of appreciation is higher for birthday gift givers than for birthday gift receivers. a. Why is this study designed? b. Specify the key elements of the study: experimental unit, response variable, factor, and treatments.
asked 2021-07-02
An investor plans to put $50,000 in one of four investments. The return on each investment depends on whether next year’s economy is strong or weak. The following table summarizes the possible payoffs, in dollars, for the four investments.
Certificate of deposit
Office complex
Land speculation
Technical school
amp; Strong amp;6,000 amp;15,000 amp;33,000 amp;5,500
amp; Weak amp;6,000 amp;5,000 amp;−17,000 amp;10,000
Let V, W, X, and Y denote the payoffs for the certificate of deposit, office complex, land speculation, and technical school, respectively. Then V, W, X, and Y are random variables. Assume that next year’s economy has a 40% chance of being strong and a 60% chance of being weak. a. Find the probability distribution of each random variable V, W, X, and Y. b. Determine the expected value of each random variable. c. Which investment has the best expected payoff? the worst? d. Which investment would you select? Explain.
...