Suppose the function f : <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mi mathvariant="double-struc

Caitlyn Cole

Caitlyn Cole

Answered question

2022-04-30

Suppose the function f : R R is continuous. For a natural number k, let x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x k be points in [ a , b ]. Prove there is a point z in [ a , b ] at which
f ( z ) = ( f ( x 1 ) + f ( x 2 ) + . . . + f ( x k ) ) / k
So I'm thinking about applying the intermediate value theorem:

If
a < x 1 < b , a < x 2 < b , . . . , a < x k < b
then
f ( a ) < f ( x 1 ) < f ( b ) , . . . , f ( a ) < f ( x k ) < f ( b )
or
k . f ( a ) < f ( x 1 ) + . . . + f ( x k ) < k . f ( b )
f ( a ) < ( f ( x 1 ) + f ( x 2 ) + . . . + f ( x k ) ) / k < f ( b )
But I couldn't think of any way to prove that f ( a ) < f ( x k ) < f ( b ) or is it even true?

EDIT: Thanks everyone for your effort.

Answer & Explanation

Bethany Mills

Bethany Mills

Beginner2022-05-01Added 14 answers

Hint:

Take z { x 1 , x k } such that f ( z ) f ( x j ) for any x j .

Take w { x 1 , x k } such that f ( w ) f ( x j ) for any x j .

Then
f ( z ) f ( x 1 ) + + f ( x k ) k f ( w )
Now, use the intermediate value theorem.
tswe0uk

tswe0uk

Beginner2022-05-02Added 19 answers

m 1 k i = 1 k f ( x i ) M where M = max f ( x ) , m = min f ( x ) on [ a , b ], Now apply IVT

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?