A question on Hamilton Quaternions
How does one prove that ring
Ingrid Senior
Answered question
2022-03-01
A question on Hamilton Quaternions How does one prove that ring of Hamilton Quaternions with coefficients coming from the field is not a divison ring.
Answer & Explanation
Avneet Booth
Beginner2022-03-02Added 3 answers
This answer builds on damiano's comment. Because of Wedderburn's theorem, we know that there are no finite-dimensional non-commutative division algebras over . In particular, every quaternion algebra over is split, i.e., isomorphic to the algebra of matrices over . Can we see this directly by arguments particular to quaternion algebras? Yes. For instance, a quaternion algebra is split iff its associated norm form is isotropic -- i.e., there exists such that . In the case of the Hamiltonian quaternion algebra, As Robin points out, one way to see that this form is isotropic over Fp is to realize that by Lagrange's Four Squares Theorem, p is a sum of four integral squares, and then reduce modulo p. This is overkill. The fact that any quadratic form in at least three variables over a finite field is isotropic is a special case of the (easy to prove) Chevalley-Warning theorem Even this is more than is necessary: it follows from a simple counting argument that any nondegenerate quadratic form in at least two variables over is universal, i.e., represents every nonzero element of the field. From this we get that every nondegenerate quadratic form in at least three variables over a finite field is isotropic, and in particular the norm form of any quaternion algebra over a finite field is split. In fact the universality of binary quadratic forms over finite fields is the key to this result. Assuming the characteristic is not 2, the quaternion algebra may be represented as . For a quaternion algebra over any field F (of characteristic not 2), a necessary and sufficient criterion for Q to be split is that b is a norm in the extension . Thus the universality of the norm form of implies that all quaternion algebras over are split. For that matter, from the perspective of Galois cohomology, Wedderburn's theorem is not especially deep or difficult to prove. Using standard properties of cohomology of cyclic groups, it comes down to showing that for any finite degree extension of finite fields, the norm map is surjective, and this may also be proved by an elementary counting argument (or simply by a straightforward calculation).