Can anyone see a way to simplify one of these

Kelly Nelson

Kelly Nelson

Answered question

2022-01-01

Can anyone see a way to simplify one of these expressions?
cos2θsinϕ+sin2θcosϕ
or
sin2θsinϕcos2θcosϕ
Ive

Answer & Explanation

encolatgehu

encolatgehu

Beginner2022-01-02Added 27 answers

cos2sinϕ+sin2θcosϕ=
=(1sin2(θ))sinϕ+sin2θcosϕ=
=sinϕ+sin2(θ)(cos(ϕ)sinϕ)=
=sinϕ+sin2(θ)(cos(ϕ)+cos(ϕ+π4))=
=sinϕ+2sin2(θ)(cos(ϕ+π4)cos(π4))
=sinϕ+2sin2(θ)cos(ϕ+π4)
redhotdevil13l3

redhotdevil13l3

Beginner2022-01-03Added 30 answers

The expressions are pretty simple. You could write
f=cos2θsinϕ+sin2θcosϕ=12(sin(π4+ϕ)cos2θsin(π4ϕ))
g=sin2θsinϕcos2cosϕ=12(sin(π4ϕ)+cos2θsin(π4+ϕ))
but those are not what I'd call "simpler". (That said, if your context lends some significance to the quantity ϕ±π4, then there could be some benefit here.)
Depending upon your needs, it could be useful to write them as
f=cos2θcosϕ(tan2θ+tanϕ)
g=cos2θcosϕ(1tan2θtanϕ)
Those may-or-may-not seem better, but note that the ratio f/g looks an awful lot like (the negative of) the angle-addition formula for tangent ... if only we had tan2θ=tanψ for some ψ. But in that case, we'd have
cos2θ=11+tan2θ=11+tanψ=cosψsinψ+cosψ=cosψ2sin(ψ+π4)
sin2θ=sinψ2sin(ψ+π4)
whereupon, we'd obtain
f=sin(ψ+ϕ)2sin(ψ+π4)     g=cos(ψ+ϕ)2sin(ψ+π4)
Those are also not necessarily "simpler" than the original forms, and the tan2θtanψ re-parameterization may not be appropriate for your particular needs
We couuld even take it further, defining ψ=ψ+ππ4 and ϕ=ϕπ4:
f=sin(ψ+ϕ)2sinψ     g=cos()ψ+ϕ2sinψ
but there's a danger of veering too far outside the context of your investigation.
Vasquez

Vasquez

Expert2022-01-08Added 669 answers

Hint: cost=eit+eit2,sint=eiteit2i,t=θ, ϕ

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?