Lily wants to define a transformation (or series of transformations) using only rotations, reflections or translations that takes Figure A to Figure B

banganX

banganX

Answered question

2021-02-03

Lily wants to define a transformation (or series of transformations) using only rotations, reflections or translations that takes Figure A to Figure B.
image
Which statement about the transformation that Lily wants to define is true?
A. It can be defined with two reflections.
B.It can be defined with one rotation and one translation.
C. It cannot be defined because Figure A and Figure B are not congruent.
D.It cannot be defined because the longest side of Figure B is on the bottom.

Answer & Explanation

yagombyeR

yagombyeR

Skilled2021-02-04Added 92 answers

Step 1

Observe that the quadrilateral in figure A lacks any parallel sides.
The figure B is a quadrilateral with a pair of opposite sides parallel. That is figure B is a trapezium. 
The figure A and figure B are not congruent, since A is a quadrilateral and B a trapezium. 
Therefore, Figure A cannot be transformed to figure B by using only rotations, reflections or translations. 
Step 2

The correct option is C. 
Because Figure A and Figure B are identical, it cannot be defined..

Do you have a similar question?

Recalculate according to your conditions!

New Questions in High school geometry

Ask your question.
Get an expert answer.

Let our experts help you. Answer in as fast as 15 minutes.

Didn't find what you were looking for?