prove that for all rational numbers r and s, rs is rational

sagnuhh 2020-11-27 Answered
prove that for all rational numbers r and s, rs is rational
You can still ask an expert for help

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question

Expert Answer

Answered 2020-11-28 Author has 87 answers

Given that r and s are rational numbers. That is r and s can be written in the form r=ab and s=cd,b,d is not zero.
Obtain the value of r×s as shown below.
Note that, b, d is not equal to zero. Therefore, bd is not zero.
Further, note that as a, b, c and d are integers ac and bd are also integers.
Step 2
Therefore, note that the product r×s is the ratio of two integers with denominator not equal to zero.
It is known that, the above is a definition of a rational number.
Thus, the product r×s is rational.
Hence proved.

Not exactly what you’re looking for?
Ask My Question

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Relevant Questions

asked 2021-02-25
True or False. The graph of a rational function may intersect a horizontal asymptote.
asked 2022-02-16
What is rational function and how do you find domain, vertical and horizontal asymptotes. Also what is "holes" with all limits and continuity and discontinuity?
asked 2022-05-12
I have a rational function:
y = x 2 3 x x 2 + 2 x 48
The explanation I was given to find the x-intercepts was: "let y = 0, and solve for x. Basically you just set the numerator of the fraction equal to 0 and factor."
What does "basically" mean? Is this always the case? Do you simply set the numerator expression equal to zero, and always ignore the contents of the denominator? If so, why do you ignore the contents of the denominator?
asked 2022-05-15
We know that given a rational number of the from p / q if we expand it in the decimal base that is an expansion in power of 10 and we know that coefficient is repeating after finite step. In other words, we can say that we need only finitely many coefficients to describe the rest. Let F ( z ) be a rational function that is F ( z ) = p ( z ) q ( z ) . I take the Taylor series expansion of F ( z ) at the point away from the pole (maybe in a local coordinate around the point). Say
F ( z ) z = a t k ( z a ) k
My question is there any finite condition on the coefficient of t k ? That is we need only finitely many t k 's to determine the rest? If so what will be the proof?
asked 2022-05-28
Let X be a locally Noetherian scheme and let f be a rational function on X (i.e. the equivalence class of a pair ( U , f ), where f O X ( U ) and U contains the associated points of X, under obvious equivalence relation).
While reading Vakil's notes I wondered how could we define poles of such a rational function. After some thought I came up with the following definition: I'd say that a regular codimension one point p is a pole if it's not in the domain of definition of f. If X is also an integral scheme (or at least if all the stalks of O X are integral domains, in which case we can cover X with integral schemes), then this definition would coincide with the usual one, namely using the discrete valuation at p.
But there is something unnatural about my definition, since I was not able to relate the rational function with the discrete valuation on O X , p and consequently was not able to determine the order of the pole. So I'd like to know if it's possible to define a meaningful notion of poles for rational functions on locally Noetherian schemes and how would it relate to my definition. By extension, consider the same question about zeros.
asked 2021-09-15
Let F be the field of rational functions described in the Example.
(a) Show that the ordering given there satisfies the order axioms O1, O2, and O3.
(b) Write the following polynomials in order of increasing size: x2,x3,5,x+2,3x.
(c) Write the following functions in order of increasing size:
asked 2022-02-16
Help me with creating a rational function with vertical asymptotes x=±1 and oblique asymptote of y=2x3 and a y-intercept of 4.