To provide: An explanation for the somewhat surprising result of the study.

vazelinahS 2021-01-08 Answered
To provide: An explanation for the somewhat surprising result of the study.
You can still ask an expert for help

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Solve your problem for the price of one coffee

  • Available 24/7
  • Math expert for every subject
  • Pay only if we can solve it
Ask Question

Expert Answer

pattererX
Answered 2021-01-09 Author has 95 answers
Some variables which are in correlation with response variable or explanatory variables might be the reason for the surprising results.
Not exactly what you’re looking for?
Ask My Question

Expert Community at Your Service

  • Live experts 24/7
  • Questions are typically answered in as fast as 30 minutes
  • Personalized clear answers
Learn more

Relevant Questions

asked 2021-01-31
The centers for Disease Control reported the percentage of people 18 years of age and older who smoke (CDC website, December 14, 2014). Suppose that a study designed to collect new data on smokers and Questions Navigation Menu preliminary estimate of the proportion who smoke of .26.
a) How large a sample should be taken to estimate the proportion of smokers in the population with a margin of error of .02?(to the nearest whole number) Use 95% confidence.
b) Assume that the study uses your sample size recommendation in part (a) and finds 520 smokers. What is the point estimate of the proportion of smokers in the population (to 4 decimals)?
c) What is the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of smokers in the population?(to 4 decimals)?
asked 2020-12-30
To state:The null and alternative hypotheses.
The sample of 223 sales executives are presented by sales scenarios. Each subject was assigned to the one of the five closing techniques. Sales executives wereasked about their level of trust in the 7-point scale.
asked 2020-11-01
An investigator wants to test whether exposure to secondhand smoke before 1 year of life is associated with development of childhood asthma (defined as asthma diagnosed before 5 years of age). Give two possible study designs.
asked 2020-11-08
To state:A factor that could affect the value of the response variable that is fixed at a set level.
asked 2021-03-02
In the 1970s a study was conducted in Philadelphia in which 500 cases were randomly assigned to treatments for the common cold: 250 subjects received the medication and 250 received a placebo. A total of 383 patients improved within 24 hours. Of those who received the medication 241 improved within 24 hours and of those who received the placebo 142 improved within 24 hours. A test of significance was conducted on the following hypotheses.
Ho: The rates for the two treatments are equal.
Ha: The treatment of medication has a higher improvement rate.
This test resulted in a p-value of 0.0761.
a.) Interpret what this p-value measures in the context of this study.
b.) Based on this p-value and study design, what conclusion should be drawn in the context of this study? Use a significance level of α=0.05.
c.) Based on your conclusion in part (b), which type of error, Type I or Type II, could have been made? What is one potential consequence of this error?
asked 2021-02-16
Participants enter a research study with unique characteristics that produce different scores from one person to another. For an independent-measures study, these individual differences can cause problems. Identify the problems and briefly explain how they are eliminated or reduced with a repeated-measures study. Independent-measures study is used in the study.
asked 2021-02-01
To compare and contrast:Observational studies and designed experiments and to identify the study that allows a researcher to claim causality.